Page 274 -
P. 274

The Role of Organizational Culture                                    257



               coming together, the challenge is to create, intentionally, a new culture that refl ects
               the most strategic aspects of the parent organizations. Cultural integration in a merger
               situation is about understanding and melding what can be two very different  “ shared
               lives, ”  and growing a new one in the process.
                    Those who are tasked with furthering cultural integration have to assess the issues
               above for the premerger partners, and then address the questions below:
                   •     What are the most compatible elements of our former organizations ’  cultures?
                   •     What are the elements that suggest the greatest potential confl ict?
                   •     What would we like the new organization ’ s culture to look like?
                   •     What do we want to be certain to bring forward into the new culture?
                   •     What will be some indicators of successful cultural integration in our new
               organization?
                    Through a deliberate and inclusive process of considering and discussing these
               issues, the new organization can build trust, camaraderie, and the beginnings of a new
               culture that will develop and evolve over the new organization ’ s future. This can be
               the most challenging and, in many ways, the most rewarding work of postmerger
               integration.


                     Box 7.8
                 An example: Sigma

                    Sigma is a team-oriented completely virtual German organization ( Lemken, Kahler, and
                  Rittenbruch 2000 ). They went from twenty founding members to two-hundred employ-
                  ees with home offi ces throughout the country. They introduced a bulletin board service
                  and local groups met biweekly or bimonthly. All employees met face-to-face once a
                  year. Each area, each branch ended up having its own local culture. There was a great
                  deal of resistance to any top-down implementation of a KM system as well as to any
                  attempts to change their culture. In the early years, Sigma was a small group of indi-
                  viduals who had no trouble networking. Rapid growth and increasing virtualization
                  changed the early culture of Sigma. Technology could not replace their tradition of
                  personal-network-based collaboration and oral sharing of knowledge. However, what
                  did succeed was a highly fl exible approach. Transparency about activities resulted in
                  the creation of a culture of trust. KM is thus an evolutionary process that needs to
                  be embedded into the organizational culture. By allowing organizational members to
                  participate in the development of content, rules, and goals, greater cohesion will result
                  and this will help move the organization to a higher level of organizational and KM
                  maturity.
   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279