Page 353 -
P. 353

336                                                              Chapter 9



                    Intellectual assets also come from widening the aperture of the lens used to see
               intellectual assets. For example, by looking to contractors and consultants who
               develop intellectual assets for the company, the company is likely to discover assets
               it owns that had not been considered. In the process that links identifying intellectual
               assets to extracting them for profi t, a company will often see opportunities to create
               new intellectual assets. A company can cultivate creativity to create assets, which can
               be identifi ed and extracted for profi t to the organization.
                    Lev (2001) views intangible assets as nonscarce. Deployment of an intangible asset
               is possible at the same time in multiple uses. Intangibles increase in value when used.
               This is also referred to as scalability: the value of intangibles increases when the scale
               at which they are used increases. Intangibles are not subject to diminishing returns
               as are tangible assets, but have increasing returns. Intangibles also have strong network
               effects. Although not exclusively applicable to intangibles, network effects are char-
               acteristic for intangibles in the sense that intangibles often form the core of important
               networks.
                    Intangibles create future value. All intangibles are future-oriented and because of
               this they are ignored by traditional accounting systems based on conservatism and
               materialism.
                    Intangibles are diffi cult to manage and to exclusively control. Taking full advantage
               of the tacit knowledge residing in employees is more diffi cult than exploiting the value
               of a building or a machine to its maximum. Copying or re-engineering of intellectual
               assets is often relatively easy, and we have limited ability to protect using property
               rights. Cost accounting systems are not well geared toward intangible assets, and are
               even wholly inaccurate for managing intangible assets-intensive corporations. Intan-
               gibles cannot be owned (except legal property rights). Intangibles investments are
               therefore typically more risky due to the fact that intangibles play the most dominant
               role in the early stages of the innovation process. Proper management can deal with
               this, that is, R & D alliances and diversifi ed innovation project portfolios.
                    Intangible assets are nonphysical and therefore inherently diffi cult to trade. Legal
               protection is weak. There are large sunk costs and low marginal costs. Open exchanges
               for intangibles are in their infancy. Intangibles cannot directly be measured. Valuing
               intangibles is diffi cult. Intangibles are not evidenced by fi nancial transactions (as
               tangibles are).

                 Key Points


                   •    KM auditing is often the fi rst step in any KM initiative as it serves to inventory what
               knowledge-intensive resources exist within a company. This provides a snapshot of
   348   349   350   351   352   353   354   355   356   357   358