Page 361 -
P. 361

344                                                             Chapter 10



               show the loss of intellectual capital, and the subsequent impact to the company, if
               one thousand employees would suddenly leave the company ( Roos and Roos 1998 ).
               However, KPMG ’ s research indicates that, after losing key employees, 43 percent of
               organizations experienced damage to a main customer relationship, 50 percent had
               lost knowledge of best practice information, and 10 percent had lost signifi cant
               income ( Warren 1999 ).
                    Most current approaches place a value on intellectual capital in the following way:
               for publicly traded companies, the value of intellectual capital (IC) is the difference
               between the market capitalization and the book value (summation of assets less depre-
               ciation) of the company ( Roos and Roos 1998 ). For example, Intel ’ s market capitaliza-
               tion in 1997 was $110 billion, while its fi nancial book value was $17 billion. This
               hidden value of $93 billion is stated as the value of Intel ’ s intellectual capital ( Sveiby
               1997 ).  Roos and Roos (1998)  made a similar comparison with Microsoft. A recent study
               by the Brookings Institute in Washington shows that this  “ missing value ”  grew from
               38 percent of a company ’ s market capitalization in 1982 to 62 percent in 1995
               ( Dzinkowski 1999 ).
                    Skandia, a Swedish insurance company, has made strides to quantify its intellectual
               capital through further exploration. Using work that won the 1992 Nobel Prize in
               Economics, Skandia has divided IC into several subsets, customer capital, human
               capital, and organizational capital ( Roos and Roos 1998 ). In  Skandia  ’ s annual Intel-
               lectual Capital Prototype Report, these terms are defi ned with supporting details
               regarding how calculations of value are made. Skandia ’ s advancements, as well as
               efforts by KPMG ( Andriessen 2000 ), Buckman Laboratories, and McKinsey  &  Company
               ( Davenport 1996 ), are providing tools by which management can determine the com-
               pany ’ s present IC value and foresee future IC growth (or shrinkage). These tools are
               being used by Deutsche Bank to give loans with only IC as collateral ( Henry and King
               1999 ).
                    The Skandia Intellectual Capital model is called the Skandia Navigator ( Wall,
               Kirk, and Martin 2004 ). Four key dimensions of business form the core of this
               model:
                   •     Financial focus, represented in monetary terms
                   •     Customer focus, a fi nancial and nonfi nancial measure of the value of customer
               capital
                   •    Process focus, addressing the effective use of technology within the organization
                   •    Renewal and development focus, which attempts to capture the innovative capabi-
               lities of the organization
   356   357   358   359   360   361   362   363   364   365   366