Page 442 -
P. 442

Future Challenges for KM                                              425



                    KM is not a technology-based concept. All-inclusive KM solutions, despite vendor
               claims to the contrary, simply do not exist. Companies that implement a centralized
               database system, electronic message board, web portal, or any other collaborative tool
               in the hope that they have established a KM program are wasting both their time and
               money. While technology can support KM, it is not the starting point of a KM
               program. KM decisions should be based on who/whom (people), what (knowledge),
               and why (business objectives). You should save the how (technology) for last. In other
               words, successful KM begins with a sound KM strategy combined with a fostering
               organizational culture that enables and rewards the sharing of valuable knowledge.
                    A KM program should never be divorced from a business goal. For example, while
               sharing best practices is a commendable idea, there must be an underlying business
               reason to do so. Without a solid business case, KM is a futile exercise. Knowledge is
               also not static. Since knowledge can get stale fast, the content in a KM program should
               be constantly updated, amended, and deleted. What is more, the relevance of knowl-
               edge at any given time changes, as do the skills of employees. Therefore, there is no
               endpoint to a KM program. Like product development, marketing and R & D, KM is a
               constantly evolving business practice. Finally, companies diligently need to be on the
               lookout for information overload. Quantity rarely equals quality, and KM is no excep-
               tion. Indeed, the point of a KM program is to identify and disseminate knowledge
               gems from a sea of information.
                    The key critical issues are discussed in this chapter:
                   •     Access issues: What are the political issues factors governing Internet information
               seeking?
                   •     Organizational issues: What is the political context of the organization and how
               does this affect KM?
                   •     Accounting issues: What is the impact of a shift from resource-based assets to
               knowledge-based assets (i.e., from tangible, measurable assets to intangible ones)?
                   •     How do copyright (and  “ copyleft ” ) and other intellectual property issues impact
               KM? How can knowledge be shared without losing attribution and without false
               attribution?

                 Political Issues Regarding Internet Search Engines


                   Googlewhacking  is a term that has entered our language recently. Googlewhacking
               refers to the  “ challenging pursuit of searching the popular Google search engine with a
               two-word or more search argument that will produce exactly (no less and no more
   437   438   439   440   441   442   443   444   445   446   447