Page 314 - Law and the Media
P. 314

The Human Rights Act 1998
             environment, such as the noise generated by aircraft and serious environmental pollution
             (Hatton v United Kingdom (2001)).

             In X and Y v Netherlands (1985), the European Court of Human Rights made clear that:

                  . . . although the object of Article 8 is essentially that of protecting the individual
                  against arbitrary interference by the public authorities, it does not merely compel
                  the State to abstain from such interference: in addition to this primary negative
                  obligation, there may be positive obligations inherent in an effective respect for
                  family life. These obligations may involve the adoption of measures designed to
                  secure respect for private life even in the sphere of the relations of individuals
                  between themselves.


             As a result, there is a strong argument that the HRA places the English courts under a duty
             to develop the law to protect privacy.



             19.3.3 Freedom of expression (Article 10)

             General principles
             Article 10 states:

                  1. Everyone has the right to freedom of expression.  This right shall include
                     freedom to hold opinions and to receive and impart information and ideas
                     without interference by public authority and regardless of frontiers. This Article
                     shall not prevent States from requiring the licensing of broadcasting, television
                     or cinema enterprises.
                  2. The exercise of these freedoms, since it carries with it duties and responsibili-
                     ties, may be subject to such formalities, conditions, restrictions or penalties as
                     are prescribed by law and are necessary in a democratic society, in the interests
                     of national security, territorial integrity or public safety, for the prevention of
                     disorder or crime, for the protection of health or morals, for the protection of the
                     reputation or rights of others, for preventing the disclosure of information
                     received in confidence, or for maintaining the authority and impartiality of the
                     judiciary.

             It has been repeatedly made clear by the European Court of Human Rights that freedom of
             expression ‘constitutes one of the essential foundations of a democratic society and one of
             the basic conditions for its progress and for each individual’s self fulfilment’.

             Content of expression
             Freedom of expression is applicable to ‘information’ or ‘ideas’ that are favourably received
             or regarded as inoffensive or as a matter of indifference. It is also applicable to information
             or ideas that offend, shock or disturb the State or any sector of the population, because
             without such pluralism, tolerance and broadmindedness there is no ‘democratic society’.
                                                                                           277
   309   310   311   312   313   314   315   316   317   318   319