Page 18 - Materials Chemistry, Second Edition
P. 18

Life cycle assessment: origins, principles and context

                   Nevertheless, LCA has rapidly developed an important niche within the growing arenas of   5
                 environmental management, policy and planning.
                    There is a spectrum of environmental management tools and techniques, ranging from the
                 overarching ‘visioning’ type, to the specific ‘assessment’ type, to communication and reporting.
                 Among the first type, which fosters sustainability within public, corporate and other organisa-
                 tions, The Natural Step is designed to assist an organisation to set environmental objectives and
                 to re-think and change around these objectives. It advocates backcasting from principles and
                 consensus processes to advance society towards sustainability through organisational change.
                 Notwithstanding the institutional limits of such techniques (Sandström 2005), LCA can help
                 inform change by providing information about environmental burdens of products and services
                 associated with any organisation. LCA is particularly useful in decisions requiring comparison
                 of environmental outcomes and can be extended through tools such as Multi-Criteria Assess-
                 ment, where quantitative and qualitative information is ranked and assessed across different
                 environmental criteria.
                    Systematic tools to assess, monitor, document, manage and maintain environmental per-
                 formance are often modelled on ISO 14001 or similar environmental management systems,
                 which in turn have their origins in quality management. These management approaches may
                 also incorporate or usefully draw upon LCA, especially where specific LCA studies have been
                 undertaken to investigate particular processes, products or services associated with the organ-
                 isation concerned.
                    Environmental management outcomes are typically reported in order to demonstrate com-
                 pliance or performance. A range of environmental reporting systems and initiatives exist,
                 either for Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) compliance or more general ‘Triple Bottom Line’
                 or environmental corporate reports. Here, LCA mainly provides background evidence for
                 assessment of environmental benefits, burdens or burdens foregone.
                    There are a wide range of other applications of LCA to ‘environmental assessment’. For
                 example, popular ‘eco-footprint’ and related calculators and tools may use LCA data, and
                 advisory program information may draw on LCA results; for instance, in stating that compact
                 fluorescent lamps generate lower environmental impacts than incandescent varieties. The ‘new’
                 tools of community engagement and ‘behaviour change’ for environmental outcomes may also
                 draw on LCA data either in modelling or substantiating potential benefits of particular changes.
                 LCA, like any modelling technique, is only as good as the modeller and the assumptions and
                 data employed in the exercise. Indeed, this assertion is a central theme in this book.


                 1.4  Principles, practice and prospects for LCA: a reader’s guide
                 While data challenges and complexities of application may have previously held LCA back,
                 many of these are now reduced or at least are better understood. Various options exist for further
                 improving data quality and convenience of use through quicker, easier and more ubiquitous
                 access to LCA results while maintaining sufficient quality, accuracy and rigour. The data chal-
                 lenge and the balance between quality and quantity are also important themes for this book.
                    Given that a range of more or less qualitative judgements and unforeseen outcomes may
                 affect the accuracy of predictions, how can LCA provide confidence in results? This is not
                 straightforward, and indeed, LCA results have not always been accepted uncritically – often
                 with good reason. The main strategies adopted to provide confidence are transparency and
                 peer review. Both are strongly advocated in ISO standards.
                    In Chapters 2–5 LCA practice and a range of connected issues is described and critiqued.
                 Chapter 2 charts the development of LCA and associated institutions, including SETAC, ISO,
                 the Australian LCA Society (ALCAS) and the UNEP/SETAC Life Cycle Initiative. Policies and








         100804•Life Cycle Assessment 5pp.indd   5                                        17/02/09   12:46:14 PM
   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23