Page 201 - Materials Chemistry, Second Edition
P. 201

Sustainability of (H 2 ? CH 4 ) by Anaerobic Digestion          189

            4.2 The Evaluation of EROI and EPT

            In this section, the sustainability of AD is evaluated by EROI and EPT. In this
            manner, it is possible to score the H 2 ? CH 4 produced by the AD against other
            energy technologies; the AD is equivalent to ‘‘mine mouth’’ for fossil energy
            sources.
              EROI and EPT are evaluated using the Eqs. (14) and (15). The results are
            shown in Figs. 8 and 9, considering two cases: with or without the contribution of
            labor in the Total Indirect Energy. The EROI and EPT values versus the reactor
            diameter are reported. The sustainability of the technology increases with the
            dimensions: without the labor contribution, EROI is higher than 1 for a diame-
            ter [1 m; with the labor contribution, the technology is sustainable for higher
            diameters than 2 m.
                                                                           ð14Þ
                                      EROI ¼ E net = E ind
                                      EPT ¼ t d = EROI                     ð15Þ

            In Table 5, the values of EROI and EPT are reported for the two diameters
            considered in previous paragraph for the evaluation of useful energy.
              In spite of the fact that the energy labor as only food contribution in this
            analysis, a great effect of labor on the EROI for low diameters of the bioreactor
            was found.
              A comparison of the evaluated EROI and EPT of H 2 ? CH 4 values with other
            energy technologies ranks the AD technology in a good position among renewable
            and fossil energy sources (see Table 6). The sensitivity of EROI and EPT to the
            indirect energy of materials has been investigated: the main case previously
            described, with polystyrene foam as the insulator, is compared with other cases, in
            order to permit a comparison between different insulating materials. Physical and
            thermophysical properties are reported in Table 7. In the sensitivity evaluation, net
            energy value has been kept constant, i.e., k/s = cost., which means that the
            thickness of the insulating walls varies according to thermal conductivity value.



            Fig. 8 EROI of an AD                              EROI
            process with and without the       4
            labor contribution
                                               3
                                              [#]  2
                                               1
                                               0
                                                 0    2     4     6    8    10
                                                          Diameter [m]
                                                      with labour   without labour
   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206