Page 126 - Materials Chemistry, Second Edition

122 5. Development and applicability of life cycle impact assessment methodologies

Hertwich, E.G., McKone, T.E., Pease, W.S., 1999. Parameter uncertainty and variability in evaluative fate and expo-
sure models. Risk Anal. 19, 1193–1204.
Hoogmartens, R., Van Passel, S., Van Acker, K., Dubois, M., 2014. Bridging the gap between LCA, LCC and CBA as
sustainability assessment tools. Environ. Impact. Asses. 48, 27–33.
Hosseinijou, S.A., Mansour, S., Shirazi, M.A., 2014. Social life cycle assessment for material selection: a case study of
building materials. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 19, 620–645.
Houillon, G., Jolliet, O., 2005. Life cycle assessment of processes for the treatment of wastewater urban sludge: energy
and global warming analysis. J. Clean. Prod. 13, 287–299.
Huang, B., Mauerhofer, V., 2016. Life cycle sustainability assessment of ground source heat pump in Shanghai, China.
J. Clean. Prod. 119, 207–214.
Huijbregts, M., 1998. Application of Uncertainty and Variability in LCA. Part I: A General Framework for the Analysis
of Uncertainty and Variability in Life Cycle Assessment.
Hunkeler, D., 2006. Societal LCA methodology and case study (12 pp). Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 11, 371–382.
Hunkeler, D., Rebitzer, G., 2005. The future of life cycle assessment. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 10, 305–308.
Hunt, R.G., Franklin, W.E., Hunt, R.G., 1996. LCA—how it came about. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 1, 4–7.
I.E. Agency, 2018. World Energy Outlook 2018.
Intergovernmental Panel On Climate Change, 2014. Climate Change 2013—The Physical Science Basis: Working
Group I Contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cam-
bridge University Press, Cambridge.
ISO, 2006a. Environmental Management-Life Cycle Assessment-Principles and Frameworks, 14040, Genene,
Switzerland.
ISO, 2006b. Environmental Management—Life Cycle Assessment—Principles and Framework., 14040-2006.
ISO, 2006c. Environmental management—life cycle assessment—requirements and guidelines. In: O.F. Standardiza-
tion (Ed.) 14044, Switzerland.
Jørgensen, A., 2013. Social LCA—a way ahead? Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 18, 296–299.
Khan, F.N., Alan, P.T.L., Zhaohui, L., Chao, L., Wai, P.K.A., 2010. Statistical analysis of optical signal-to-noise ratio
monitoring using delay-tap sampling. IEEE Photonic Tech. Lett. 22, 149–151.
Khang, D.S., Tan, R.R., Uy, O.M., Promentilla, M.A.B., Tuan, P.D., Abe, N., Razon, L.F., 2017. Design of experiments
for global sensitivity analysis in life cycle assessment: the case of biodiesel in Vietnam. Resour. Conserv. Recy.
119, 12–23.
Kloepffer, W., 2008. Life cycle sustainability assessment of products. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 13, 89.
Kl€ opffer, W., 2003. Life-cycle based methods for sustainable product development. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 8, 157.
Kl€ opffer, W., Ciroth, A., 2011. Is LCC relevant in a sustainability assessment? Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 16, 99–101.
Lehmann, A., Zschieschang, E., Traverso, M., Finkbeiner, M., Schebek, L., 2013. Social aspects for sustainability as-
sessment of technologies—challenges for social life cycle assessment (SLCA). Int. J. Life Cycle Assess.
18, 1581–1592.
Lindahl, M., Sundin, E., Sakao, T., 2014. Environmental and economic benefits of integrated product service offerings
quantified with real business cases. J. Clean. Prod. 64, 288–296.
Liu, J., Ma, X., 2009. The analysis on energy and environmental impacts of microalgae-based fuel methanol in China.
Energ. Policy 37, 1479–1488.
Liu, Z., Li, T., Jiang, Q., Zhang, H., 2014. Life cycle assessment–based comparative evaluation of originally
manufactured and remanufactured diesel engines. J. Ind. Ecol. 18, 567–576.
Lopes, E., Dias, A., Arroja, L., Capela, I., Pereira, F., 2003. Application of life cycle assessment to the Portuguese pulp
and paper industry. J. Clean. Prod. 11, 51–59.
Lundie, S., Peters, G.M., 2005. Life cycle assessment of food waste management options. J. Clean. Prod.
13, 275–286.
Luu, L.Q., Halog, A., 2016a. Chapter Fourteen—Life cycle sustainability assessment: a holistic evaluation of social,
economic, and environmental impacts. In: Sustainability in the Design, Synthesis and Analysis of Chemical En-
gineering Processes. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, pp. 327–352.
Luu, L.Q., Halog, A., 2016b. Rice husk based bioelectricity vs. coal-fired electricity: life cycle sustainability assessment
case study in Vietnam. Procedia CIRP 40, 73–78.
Manik, Y., Leahy, J., Halog, A., 2013. Social life cycle assessment of palm oil biodiesel: a case study in Jambi Province
of Indonesia. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 18, 1386–1392.