Page 186 - Materials Chemistry, Second Edition
P. 186

184                   9. Life cycle decision support framework: Method and case study

                            TABLE 9.3 Transformation rules for Z-number linguistic variables to fuzzy
                            numbers (Aboutorab et al., 2018).
                            Linguistic terms                           Membership function
                            (EI,VL)                                    (1, 1, 1)
                            (EI,L)                                     (1, 1, 1)
                            (EI,M)                                     (1, 1, 1)
                            (EI,H)                                     (1, 1, 1)
                            (EI,VH)                                    (1, 1, 1)
                            (WI,VL)                                    (0.21, 0.32, 0.47)
                            (WI,L)                                     (0.37, 0.55, 0.82)
                            (WI,M)                                     (0.47, 0.71, 0.82)
                            (WI,H)                                     (0.56, 0.84, 1.26)
                            (WI,VH)                                    (0.63, 0.95, 1.43)
                            (FI,VL)                                    (0.47, 0.63, 0.79)
                            (FI,L)                                     (0.82, 1.10, 1.37)
                            (FI,M)                                     (1.07, 1.42, 1.78)
                            (FI,H)                                     (1.26, 1.68, 2.10)
                            (FI,VH)                                    (1.43, 1.90, 2.38)
                            (VI,VL)                                    (0.79, 0.95, 1.11)
                            (VI,L)                                     (1.37, 1.64, 1.92)
                            (VI,M)                                     (1.78, 2.13, 2.49)
                            (VI,H)                                     (2.10, 2.52, 2.94)
                            (VI,VH)                                    (2.38, 2.85, 3.33)
                            (AI,VL)                                    (1.11, 1.26, 1.42)
                            (AI,L)                                     (1.92, 2.19, 2.47)
                            (AI,M)                                     (2.49, 2.84, 3.20)
                            (AI,H)                                     (2.94, 3.36, 3.78)
                            (AI,VH)                                    (3.33, 3.80, 4.28)


                 between pairwise comparison data and the calculated weights based on the opinion of the kth
                 stakeholder; and i¼1, 2, …, m, j¼1, 2, …, n, and k¼1, 2, …, p.
                   The fuzzy weights obtained from Eq.(9.3) can be defuzzied into crisp weight by Eq. (9.4).

                                                      l j +4∗m j + u j
                                                 w j ¼                                        (9.4)
                                                           6
                 where, j¼1, 2, …, n represents the jth criterion.
   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191