Page 212 - Materials Chemistry, Second Edition
P. 212

210            10. Advancing life cycle sustainability assessment using multiple criteria decision making

                 analysis is recommended to assess the effect of weights, attributes, and MADM methods.
                 Some of the most commonly used MADM methodologies used in decision making have been
                 briefly described in the following section.



                                      10.4 Application of MADM in LCSA

                   LCSA attempts simultaneous use of different approaches (LCA, LCC, and SLCA) over
                 an alternative and presents results of analysis in an integrated manner (Ness et al., 2007).
                 Coupling of MADM with LCSA makes it possible to unite the results of the assessments
                 obtained using different methods. Additionally, a majority of research on LCSA is focused
                 on one of the three pillars (dimensions) of sustainability (environment, economic, and social)
                 or, in some cases, covering two dimensions. The dimensions can consist of multiple indicators
                 and decision making in LCSA requires judgment considering multiindicator trade-offs
                 (Tarne et al., 2019). The following subsections discuss applications of MADM-based
                 LCSA in various sectors, viz., construction, transport, water, energy, and production and
                 consumption.


                 10.4.1 Construction

                   Integration of MADM methods with LCSA has seen a significant number of applications
                 in the field of infrastructure construction. For example, Akhtar et al. (2015) attempt to develop
                 an asset management plan by comparing four types of sewer systems, which are made
                 up of (a) polyvinyl chloride (PVC), (b) ductile iron, (c) concrete, and (d) vitrified clay. For com-
                 parison, two LCSA frameworks are developed. The first framework is to integrate LCA and
                 LCC with energy synthesis. Energy is used to convert integrated values from LCA and LCC
                 into equivalent solar power. Whereas, the second framework deals with integrating
                 AHP with LCC. This, therefore, suggests that the study does not consider social aspects
                 during comparison and results suggest PVC pipe performs the best in both economic and
                 environmental aspects. In another study by Dong and Ng (2016), an LCSA framework is
                 developed for a residential housing complex in Hong Kong for an estimation from
                 cradle to end of the construction process. Experts in the study suggest that integration of
                 LCC, LCA, and SLCA must be performed using MADM methods. However, the selection
                 of MADM method and weighting process must be left with stakeholders. Similarly,
                 two six-story buildings, one made of wood and the other with concrete, from Vancouver
                 is investigated using an LCSA framework with assessment from cradle to grave. The meth-
                 odology utilizes AHP to develop a sustainability index from aggregating the impacts
                 (Hossaini et al., 2015).


                 10.4.2 Transport

                   Transport is also a field where integrated MADM and sustainability assessment studies are
                 present. A study was conducted by Sou et al. (2016) on bottom ash management from Macao
                 to China and suggested that transportation was the most sensitive component with impacts
   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217