Page 94 - Materials Chemistry, Second Edition
P. 94

References                                89
            solutions characterized at a level useful to improve the understanding of the decision-makers
            and speed-up the adaptation of the proposal to the development, for example, of a project,
            and yet complex enough as to model the process itself adequately, without losing the reliabil-
            ity of results proposed (Spangenberg, 2018).



            References
                                           ´
            Apperl, B., Pulido-Velazquez, M., Andreu Alvarez, J., Karjalainen, T.K., 2015. Contribution of the multi-attribute
              value theory to conflict resolution in groundwater management application to the Mancha Oriental groundwater
              system, Spain. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 19, 1325–1337.
            Assies, J.A., 1992. Introduction paper to SETAC-Europe workshop on environmental life cycle analysis of products.
              In: Life-Cycle Assessment, Proceedings of a SETAC-Europe Workshop on Environmental Life Cycle Assessment
              of Products, December 2–3 1991, Leiden; SETAC-Europe: Brussels, Belgium.
            Bachmann, T.M., 2013. Towards life cycle sustainability assessment: drawing on the NEEDS project’s total cost and
              multi-criteria decision analysis ranking methods. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 18, 1698–1709.
            Bell, S., Morse, S., 2018. Sustainability indicators past and present: what next? Sustainability 2018 (10), 1688.
              https://doi.org/10.3390/su10051688.
            Boron, S., Murray, K.R., Thomson, G.B., 2017. Sustainability education: towards total sustainability management
              teaching. In: Leal, F.W., Brandli, L., Castro, P., Newman, J. (Eds.), Handbook of Theory and Practice of Sustainable
              Development in Higher Education. World Sustainability Series, Springer, Cham.
            Bozhilova-Kisheva, K.P., Hu, M., Van Roekel, E., Olsen, S.I., 2012. An integrated life cycle inventory for demolition
              processes in the context of life cycle sustainability assessment. In: International Symposium on Life Cycle Assess-
              ment and Construction. IFSTTAR.
            Bruntland, G.H., 1987. Our Common Future. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
            Burton, H.V., Deierlein, G., Lallemant, D., Lin, T., 2016. Framework for incorporating probabilistic building perfor-
              mance in the assessment of community seismic resilience. J. Struct. Eng. 142, C4015007.
            Charter, M., 2001. Integrated product policy (IPP) and eco-product development (EPD). In: Proceedings Second In-
              ternational Symposium on Environmentally Conscious Design and Inverse Manufacturing, Tokyo, Japan,
              pp. 672–677.
            Coenen, L., Truffer, B., 2012. Places and spaces of sustainability transitions: geographical contributions to an emerging
              research and policy field. Eur. Plan. Stud. 20(3).
            Corona, B., Bozhilova-Kisheva, K.P., Olsen, S., Miguel, G.S., 2017. Social life cycle assessment of a concentrated solar
              power plant in Spain: a methodological proposal. J. Ind. Ecol. 21 (6), 1566–1577. https://doi.org/10.1111/
              jiec.12541.
            De Schryver, A.M., Humbert, S., Huijbregts, M.A., 2013. The influence of value choices in life cycle impact assessment
              of stressors causing human health damage. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 18, 698–706.
            Deierlein, G., Krawinkler, H., Cornell, C., 2003. A framework for performance-based earthquake engineering.
              In: Pacific Conference on Earthquake Engineering, 2003 Christchurch, New Zealand.
            Del Borghi, A., 2013. LCA and communication: environmental product declaration. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 18 (2),
              293–295. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11367-012-0513-9.
            Dreyer, L.C., Niemann, A.L., Hauschild, M.Z., 2003. Comparison of three different LCIA methods: EDIP97, CML2001
              and Eco-indicator 99. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 8, 191–200.
            Durairaj, S.K., Ong, S.K., Nee, A.Y.C., Tan, R.B.H., 2002. Evaluation of life cycle cost analysis methodologies. Corp.
              Environ. Strat. 9(1). http://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/1063568231.
            Ecoinvent, 2003. https://www.ecoinvent.org/.
            Ekener, E., Hansson, J., Larsson, A., Peck, P., 2018. Developing life cycle sustainability assessment methodology by
              applying values-based sustainability weighting-tested on biomass based and fossil transportation fuels. J. Clean.
              Prod. 181, 337–351.
            Ekener-Petersen, E., H€ oglund, J., Finnveden, G., 2014. Screening potential social impacts of fossil fuels and biofuels for
              vehicles. Energy Policy 73, 416–426.
            Elkinton, J., 1998. Cannibals with forks: the triple bottom line of 21st century business. Gabriola Island: New Society
              Publishers, Autumn, Environ. Qual. Manag, 37–51. https://doi.org/10.1002/tqem.3310080106.
   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99