Page 176 - Living Room Wars Rethinking Media Audiences for a Postmodern World
P. 176

References       167
        Naficy, H. (1993) The Making of Exile Cultures: Iranian Television in Los Angeles, Minneapolis:
           University of Minnesota Press.
        Newcomb, H. (1974) TV: The Most Popular Art, New York: Anchor Books.
        Nicholson, L.J. (ed.) (1990) Feminism/Postmodernism, New York/London: Routledge.
        Nightingale, V. (1986) ‘What’s Happening to Audience Research?’, Media Information Australia
           39(February):21–2.
        ——(1990) ‘Women as Audiences’, in M.E.Brown (ed.) Television and Women’s Culture: The
           Politics of the Popular, London: Sage.
        Olsen, S.R. (1987) ‘Meta-television: Popular Postmodernism’, Critical Studies in Mass
           Communication 4:284–300.
        Poster, M. (1988) ‘Introduction’, in J.Baudrillard, Selected Writings, ed. M.Poster, Stanford, CA:
           Stanford University Press.
        Potter, J. and Wetherell, M. (1987) Discourse and Social Psychology: Beyond Attitudes and
           Behaviour, London: Sage
        Poynton, B. and Hartley, J. (1990) ‘Male-Gazing: Australian Rules Football, Gender and
           Television’, in M.E.Brown (ed.) Television and Women’s Culture: The Politics of the Popular,
           London: Sage.
        Pratt, M.L. (1986) ‘Interpretive Strategies/Strategic Interpretations: On Anglo-American Reader-
           Response Criticism’, in J.Arac (ed.) Postmodernism and Politics, Minneapolis: University of
           Minnesota Press.
        Press, A.L. (1990) ‘Class, Gender and the Female Viewer: Women’s Responses to Dynasty’, in
           M.E.Brown (ed.) Television and Women’s Culture: The Politics of the Popular, London: Sage.
        Pribram, E.D. (ed.) (1988) Female Spectators: Looking at Film and Television, London/New York:
           Verso.
        Rabinow, P. (1977) Reflections on Fieldwork in Morocco, Berkeley/Los Angeles/ London:
           University of California Press.
        ——(1986) ‘Representations Are Social Facts: Modernity and Post-Modernity in Anthropology’, in
           J.Clifford and G.E.Marcus (eds) Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography,
           Berkeley/Los Angeles/London: University of California Press.
        Rabinow, P. and Sullivan, W.M. (eds) (1979) Interpretive Social Science, Berkeley/ Los
           Angeles/London: University of California Press.
        Radway, J. (1984) Reading the Romance: Women, Patriarchy, and Popular Literature, Chapell
           Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
        ——(1986) ‘Identifying Ideological Seams: Mass Culture, Analytical Method, and Political
           Practice’, Communication 9:93–123.
        ——(1988) ‘Reception Study: Ethnography and the Problems of Dispersed Audiences and
           Nomadic subjects’, Cultural Studies 2(3):359–76.
        Rakow, L.F. (1986) ‘Feminist Approaches to Popular Culture: Giving Patriarchy Its Due’,
           Communication 9:19–41.
        ——(1988) ‘Women and the Telephone: The Gendering of a Communications Technology’, in
           C.Kramarae (ed.) Technology and Women’s Voices, London: Routledge.
        Richardson, L. (1990) ‘Narrative and Sociology’, Journal of Contemporary Sociology, 19(1):116–
           35.
        Riley, D. (1988) ‘Am I That Name?’ Feminism and the Category of ‘Women’ in History,
           Basingstoke/London: Macmillan.
        Robertson, R. (1990) ‘Mapping the Global Condition: Globalization as the Central Concept’, in
           M.Featherstone (ed.) Global Culture, London: Sage.
        Robins, K. (1989) ‘Reimagined Communities? European Image Spaces, Beyond Fordism’, Cultural
           Studies 3(2):145–65.
        Rogers, E.M. (1962) The Diffusion of Innovations, Glencoe, IL.: Free Press.
        ——(1976) ‘Communication and Development: The Passing of a Dominant Paradigm’,
           Communications Research 3:213–40.
   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181