Page 81 - Living Room Wars Rethinking Media Audiences for a Postmodern World
P. 81

5
                   Melodramatic identifications: television

                          fiction and women’s fantasy



        During the 1980s, American popular television  fiction offered an  array  of strong and
        independent female heroines who seemed  to  defy—not without conflicts and
        contradictions, to be  sure—stereotypical definitions of femininity. Heroines such as
        Maddie Hayes (Moonlighting) and Christine Cagney (Cagney and Lacey) did not fit into
        the traditional ways in which female characters have generally been represented in prime-
        time television fiction: passive and powerless, on the one hand, and sexual objects for
        men, on the other.
           Christine Cagney, especially, and  her  partner Mary-Beth Lacey, are the kind of
        heroines who have mobilized approval from feminists (see D’Acci 1987; Clark 1990).
        Cagney and Lacey can be called a ‘social realist’ series, in which the personal and
        professional dilemmas of modern working  women are dealt with in a serious and
        ‘realistic’ way. Cagney explicitly resists sexual objectification by her male colleagues,
        forcefully challenges the male hierarchy at work, and entertains an adult, respectful and
        caring friendship with her ‘buddy’ Lacey.
           Maddie Hayes is a little more difficult to evaluate in straightforward feminist terms.
        However, while she often has  to  cope  with the all-but-abusive, but ever-so-magnetic
        machismo of her recalcitrant partner David Addison, Moonlighting, as a typical example
        of postmodernist television, self-consciously addresses, enacts and acknowledges
        metonymically the pleasures and pains of the ongoing ‘battle between the sexes’ in the
        context of the series’ characteristic penchant for hilarious absurdism and teasing parody
        (see Olsen 1987). In that battle, Maddie is neither passive nor always the loser: she fights
        and gains respect (and love) in the process.
           Many women have enjoyed watching series such as  Cagney and Lacey and
        Moonlighting,  and  it  is  likely  that  at  least part of their pleasure was related to the
        ‘positive’ representations of women that both series offer. But this does not mean that
        other, more ‘traditional’ television fictions are less  pleasurable for large numbers of
        women. On the contrary, as is well known, soap operas have traditionally been the female
        television genre, while prime-time soaps such as Dallas and Dynasty have always had a
        significantly larger female audience than a male one.
           Personally, I have often been moved by Sue Ellen of Dallas as much as I am at times
        by Christine Cagney. And yet, Sue Ellen is a radically different heroine from Cagney: she
        displays very little (will for) independence, she derives her identity almost entirely from
        being the wife of the unscrupulous and power-obsessed J.R.Ewing, whom she detests
                                                                           1
        because he is never faithful, but whom she does not have the strength to leave.  As a
        consequence, Sue Ellen’s life is dominated by constant  frustration and suffering—
   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86