Page 155 - Machine Learning for Subsurface Characterization
P. 155

130    Machine learning for subsurface characterization


            PLS        Partial least squares
            LASSO      Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator
            MARS       Multivariate adaptive regression splines
            ANN        Artificial neural network
            DBSCAN     Density-based spatial clustering of application with noise
            SOM        Self-organizing map
            GMM        Gaussian mixture model
            RE         Relative error
            t-SNE      t-Distributed stochastic neighbor embedding
            y i        Original log response at depth i
             0
            y i        Normalized value of the log response (y) at a depth i
             ^
            y i        Synthesized value of the log response (y) at a depth i
            β          Coefficient of OLS model
            w          Coefficient/parameter vector
            X          Feature vector
            Y          Target vector
            N          Gaussian distribution
            R 2        Correlation coefficient
            Subscripts
            i  Formation (i)
            j  Formation parameter (j)

            1 Introduction
            Well logging is essential for oil and gas industry to understand the in situ
            subsurface petrophysical and geomechanical properties. Certain well logs,
            like gamma ray (GR), resistivity, density, compressional sonic travel time,
            and neutron logs, are considered as “easy-to-acquire” conventional well logs
            and deployed in most of the wells. Other well logs, like nuclear magnetic
            resonance, dielectric dispersion, elemental spectroscopy, and shear wave
            travel-time logs, are deployed in limited number of wells.
               Sonic logging tools transmit compressional and shear waves through the
            formation. These waves interact with the formation matrix and fluid.
            Compressional waves travel through both the rock matrix and fluid, whereas
            shear waves travel only through the matrix. The time taken by the wave to
            travel from the transmitter to the receiver, referred as travel time, depends
            on the geomechanical properties, which are influenced by the matrix
            composition, fluid composition, and microstructure. Compressional and shear
            travel-time logs (DTC and DTS, respectively) can be computed from the
            waveforms recorded at the receiver. Sonic travel-time logs contain critical
            geomechanical information for subsurface characterization around the
            wellbore. The difference in the DTC and DTS logs is a function of the
            formation porosity, rock brittleness, and Young’s modulus, to name a few.
               Both shear and compressional travel-time logs are not acquired in all the
            wells drilled in a field due to financial or operational constraints. Under such
            circumstances, machine learning-generated synthetic DTC and DTS logs can
   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160