Page 29 - Macromolecular Crystallography
P. 29

18  MACROMOLECULAR CRYS TALLOGRAPHY

        folded, endoglycosidase sensitive glycoproteins  for yeast cells which are difficult to break. Usu-
        with defined glycosylation. The features of the CHO  ally yeast cells are disrupted using a combination of
        LecR cell line make it highly useful for preparing  physical and chemical methods. The BeadBeater™
        soluble glycoproteins that can be readily deglycosy-  (www.biospec.com) disrupts micro-organisms with
        lated prior to crystallization (Davis et al., 1993).  better than 95% efficiency. Up to 80 g (wet weight)
                                                     of cells can be processed in a typical 3-min run.
                                                     Whereas chemical methods create contamination,
        1.2.6 Cell-free systems                      the chief disadvantage of mechanical methods is the

        Cell-free in vitro expression systems are currently  generation of heat and aerosols. For this reason all
        being developed at the Centre for Eukaryotic Struc-  procedures should be carried out in an ice bath. Son-
        tural Genomics at the University of Wisconsin. As  ication should be carried out in batches of 100 ml in
        these systems express only the protein of interest  short bursts. Even if protease-deficient host strains
        and require smaller volumes, lengthy concentra-  such as lon −  have been used it is still advisable
        tion steps are avoided. The disadvantage is the  to include protease inhibitors in the resuspension
        expense of the reagents. Cell-free systems are avail-  buffer. The serine protease inhibitors aprotinin and
        able from QIAGEN (www.qiagen.com), Invtrogen  1 mM phenylmethanesulphonyl fluoride (PMSF) are
        (www.invitrogen.com), and CellFreeSciences.  commonly used but for proteins particularly suscep-
                                                     tible to proteolysis a cocktail of inhibitors to cope
                                                     with each class of protease may be required.
        1.3 Protein extraction and isolation

        1.3.1 Cell disruption                        1.3.2 The removal of cell debris and
                                                     nucleic acids
        The cells are harvested by low-speed centrifuga-
        tion and resuspended in lysis buffer before disrup-  Cell debris may be removed by centrifugation at
        tion. Either chemical or mechanical methods may  10,000 g for 30 min. The nucleic acids being the
        be used for disruption. The choice depends on  major contaminant can be removed by precipita-
        the source of the protein (that is bacterial, yeast,  tion with a positively-charged polymer such as
        insect, or mammalian, intracellular or extracellular)  polyethyleneimine PEI (typically 0.5–1% of a 10%
        and the physicochemical properties of the recom-  solution). Addition of magnesium to the resus-
        binant product, as well as the scale of the extrac-  pension buffer will assist in the enzyme digestion
        tion. For bacterial cells, enzymic digestion with  of DNA by DNAse. Some loss of protein may
        hen egg white lysozyme, which specifically catal-  occur by copreciptation, which is especially the case
        yses the hydrolysis of 1,4 glycosidic bonds in the  with some DNA-binding proteins. This can usually
        peptideoglycan cell wall of Gram-positive bacteria,  be avoided by a 1:1 dilution of the crude extract
        is a gentle procedure which minimizes denatura-  with buffer.
        tion of the product. For Gram-negative bacteria, for
        example E. coli, metal chelators such as EDTA are
                                                     1.3.3 Refolding strategies
        requiredtochelatecationsthatmaintaintheintegrity
        of the outer lipopolysaccharides. Chemical disrup-  High-levelexpressionoffull-lengthproteinsin E.coli
        tion methods require a cocktail of anions, reduc-  may result in the production of inclusion bodies.
        ing agents, non-anionic detergents, and chaotropic  These are insoluble, inactive aggregates result-
        agents in order to avoid irreversible denaturation of  ing from inappropriate folding and association via
        the product. Detergent-based lysis reagents are com-  hydrophobic interactions. The proteins are function-
        mercially available, including BugBuster™ (Merck)  ally inactive in their aggregated state. The formation
        Fastbreak (Promega).                         of inclusions can be advantageous for purification,
          Mechanical disruption methods include sonica-  provided the protein can be successfully solubilized
        tion, high-speed homogenization using a French  and renatured into its active form. This involves
        press, and bead milling, which is especially suitable  isolation of inclusions and removal of unwanted
   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34