Page 122 -
P. 122

Chapter 3 Information Systems, Organizations, and Strategy 121


                     FIGURE 3.6   FLATTENING ORGANIZATIONS

































               Information systems can reduce the number of levels in an organization by providing managers
               with information to supervise larger numbers of workers and by giving lower-level employees more
               decision-making authority.





                  These changes mean that the management span of control has also been
               broadened, enabling high-level managers to manage and control more workers
               spread over greater distances. Many companies have eliminated thousands of
               middle managers as a result of these changes.

               Postindustrial Organizations
               Postindustrial theories based more on history and sociology than economics
               also support the notion that IT should flatten hierarchies. In postindustrial
               societies, authority increasingly relies on knowledge and competence, and not
               merely on formal positions. Hence, the shape of organizations flattens because
                 professional workers tend to be self-managing, and decision making should
               become more decentralized as knowledge and information become more
                 widespread throughout the firm (Drucker, 1988).
                  Information technology may encourage task force-networked organizations
               in which groups of professionals come together—face to face or electronically—
               for short periods of time to accomplish a specific task (e.g., designing a new
               automobile); once the task is accomplished, the individuals join other task
               forces. The global consulting service Accenture is an example. Many of its
               246,000 employees move from location to location to work on projects at client
               locations in more than 120 different countries.
                  Who makes sure that self-managed teams do not head off in the wrong
               direction? Who decides which person works on which team and for how
               long? How can managers evaluate the performance of someone who is
                 constantly rotating from team to team? How do people know where their
               careers are headed? New approaches for evaluating, organizing, and







   MIS_13_Ch_03_Global.indd   121                                                                             1/17/2013   2:26:23 PM
   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127