Page 265 -
P. 265

264 Part Two  Information Technology Infrastructure


            INTERACTIVE SESSION: ORGANIZATIONS


        CONTROVERSY WHIRLS AROUND THE CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY DATABASE

        Michele Witte was one of dozens of parents who       CPSC database does not include safety problems with
        lost their children because of the defective design   these products.)
        of drop-side cribs. In 1997, Witte’s 10-month-old son   The CPSC collects reports on defective prod-
        Tyler perished when the drop-side rail on his crib   ucts from consumers, health care providers, death
        came loose, partially detached, and then trapped his   certificates, media accounts, and other sources. It
        neck between the rail and the headboard. The cribs   uses that information to make decisions on product
        are now banned. Witte wishes that a public informa-  recalls and bans, but until recently, very little of that
        tion resource for consumer complaints had been       information was accessible to the public. Federal
        available prior to the death of her child. Reading   law formerly required the approval of manufactur-
        other parents’ horror stories might have dissuaded   ers to publicize that information, and manufactur-
        her from purchasing a drop-side crib.                ers weren’t eager to release information about their
           In March 2011, the U.S. Consumer Product Safety   faulty products. Not only that, but the CPSC had to
        Commission (CPSC) stood poised to meet the needs     negotiate directly with manufacturers to determine
        of parents like Witte by launching an online data-   the terms of product recalls. Because this process
        base, located at www.saferproducts.gov. The database   usually takes a year or more, consumers continue
        will provide the public with access to the full reposi-  to buy shoddy and perhaps dangerous products like
        tory of product safety complaints that it has received.   drop-side cribs in the interim.
        Users can submit these complaints online directly      Under the new system, complaints filed by con-
        into the database. Visitors to the database will be   sumers will be posted online and be available to the
        able to search for products, read other complaints,   public within 15 days. Companies will be notified
        and view safety warnings issued by the CPSC.         within 5 days when complaints are made about their
        Complaints in the database will include a description   products, and the CPSC will give them 10 days to
        of product, the harm or risk from the product, the   respond publicly and have their comments published
        name of the manufacturer, contact information, and   alongside the complaints in the database. Users will
        an affirmation that the submitter is telling the truth.   have the option for their comments to remain confi-
        The submitter’s name will not appear in the database   dential if they prefer. Manufacturers will be able to
        but could be provided to manufacturers if the sub-   appeal to the CPSC to eliminate false or misleading
        mitter agreed.                                       complaints, and complaints will be limited to defects
           Consumer advocates such as the Consumer           that can cause injury, not reliability or product qual-
        Federation of America are praising the database as a   ity.
        revolutionary resource that will drastically improve   At a time when the federal budget is under
        the way consumers buy products. However,             increased scrutiny, programs like the CPSC database
        manufacturing companies and many members of          have become targets for cost-cutting, and manufac-
        Congress are in opposition. They argue that          turers have seized an opportunity to stop the data-
        because any user can submit a complaint, the data-   base in its tracks. The law gave CPSC new authority
        base will be filled with inaccurate and misleading   to regulate unsafe products but businesses say it is
        information—“fictitious slams” against products. It   overly burdensome. A House Energy and Commerce
        will also be open to abuse from customers with an    subcommittee is considering draft legislation to
        axe to grind, or trial lawyers seeking to tarnish a   restrict who can submit reports to the database, to
        product or manufacturer’s reputation for personal    improve how products are identified, and to resolve
        gain.                                                claims that reports are inaccurate.
           The database represents an increase in visibility   Despite strong opposition from manufacturers and
        and authority for the CPSC, which was formed in      others, in March 2011, the site was launched to gener-
        1972 by the Consumer Product Safety Act. The role    ally positive reviews. The CPSC provided additional
        of the CPSC is to regulate thousands of different    features, like the ability to attach images to com-
        types of products, with special focus on those that   ments. Commenters must provide their name, mail-
        are not regulated by other areas of the government   ing address, telephone number, and e-mail address,
        already, like food, firearms, and automobiles. (The   which is expected to curtail the types of anonymous








   MIS_13_Ch_06 Global.indd   264                                                                             1/17/2013   2:27:44 PM
   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270