Page 170 - Managing Change in Organizations
P. 170

CarnCh09v3.qxd  3/30/07  4:26 PM  Page 153







                                                                                         Leaders and situations
                                    leader–member relations (quality of personal and effective relations between
                                    leader and group members), task structure (structured vs unstructured) and posi-
                                    tion power, as situational variables. Vroom and Yetton (1973) offer a contingency
                                    model of leader decision making. The focus is a positive one. The model offers a
                                    framework by which leaders might improve both the quality and the acceptabil-
                                    ity of decisions. Hersey and Blanchard (1988) offer an outwardly practical
                                                                  ®
                                    approach to Situational Leadership . Little researched, it has become very popu-
                                    lar among practitioners (see Bryman, 1987). These authors identify the ‘readiness’
                                    of followers as a key factor in deciding on an appropriate leadership style. They
                                    believe that the leader’s task behaviour (providing guidance and direction) and
                                    relationship behaviour (team building, providing socio-emotional support)
                                    should accord with the readiness of followers. They define readiness as the will-
                                    ingness and ability of people to take responsibility for defining and directing their
                                    own task behaviour. The theory is set out in Figure 9.2. Four leadership styles are
                                    defined: delegating, participating, selling and telling. Each style represents a dif-
                                    ferent combination of task and relationship behaviour by the leader. The diagram
                                    proposes a particular combination of leadership style and readiness of followers.
                                    A ‘telling’ style is proposed for those of ‘low readiness’, namely for people who are



                                                Situational Leadership   ®
                                                    LEADER BEHAVIORS
                                    (HIGH)
                                          High                           High Task
                                          Relationship                   and High
                                          and Low Task PARTICIPATING  SELLING  Relationship


                                       SUPPORTIVE BEHAVIOR RELATIONSHIP BEHAVIOR     S3  S2  TELLING




                                                         S4
                                                              S1
                                             DELEGATING




                                                         Low High Task
                                                   Relationship and Low
                                    (LOW)         and Low Task Relationship       ®
                                         (LOW)         TASK BEHAVIOR        (HIGH)
                                                     DIRECTIVE BEHAVIOR
                                         (HIGH)     FOLLOWER READINESS      (LOW)
                                           ABLE AND  ABLE BUT  UNABLE BUT  UNABLE AND
                                          WILLING AND  UNWILLING  WILLING  UNWILLING
                                           CONFIDENT  OR INSECURE  OR CONFIDENT  OR INSECURE
                                             R4        R3        R2        R1
                                                                  ®
                                    Figure 9.2  Situational Leadership  theory from Paul Hersey et al, 2000
                                         © Copyright 2006 Reprinted with permission of the Center for
                                        Leadership Studies, Inc., Escondido, CA 92025. All rights reserved.
                                                                                                        153
   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175