Page 255 - Managing Global Warming
P. 255

214                                               Managing Global Warming


                          Relative costs breakdown of a fusion power plant
                                            Buildings and land
                                            Reactor systems and in-vessel components
                                            Replaceable in-vessel components
                                            Magnets including power supplies
                                            Heating and vacuum sysems
                                            Heat extraction and power generation systems
                                            Miscellaneous plant
                                            Construction costs
                                            Contingency
                                            Interest during construction
         Fig. 5.6 Breakdown of projected costs for a fusion power plant. Approximately half the total
         costs are fusion-specific and dominated by the magnet systems. Around a quarter of the costs are
         construction and project management, with the balance conventional plant, land, and buildings.
         From the PROCESS reactor design code Kovari M, et al. PROCESS: a systems code for fusion
         power plants—part 1: physics, Fusion Eng Des, 2014; 89(12): 3054–3069.

         (Fig. 5.6). In addition, we can use these models to try to assess the main global param-
         eters upon which the cost of electricity depends [26]:

                               β
                       η
                           P
             CoE∝A   0:6  0:5  0:4  0:4 N  0:3
                        th  e   N
         where A is the plant availability; η th is the plant thermal efficiency (electrical power
         over thermal power); P e is plant output power; β N is the plasma normalized beta; and
         N is the normalized density (the plasma density relative to the Greenwald density limit
              I
         n G ¼  2 ). The first of two of these are limited by available technology; the unit size is a
              πa
         design choice although strongly limited by technology and the capital funding avail-
         able to build a power plant; and the available normalized beta and density are func-
         tions of the plasma physics scenario that can be achieved. What these studies reinforce
         is that technological developments are at least as important as physics for fusion
         power plant economics, and that therefore fusion for energy is as much a technology
         research program as a physics one.


         5.5   Status of current research


         The current largest tokamak and only magnetic device still operating, which has
         burnt D-T is JET, the Joint European Torus, located at Culham Centre for Fusion
         Energy, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom. It is the world’s most powerful tokamak
         and is the focal point of the European fusion research program, collectively used
         by >40 European laboratories. Built in 1983, it holds the world record for fusion
         power (16MW, in 1997 [27]). JET has been continuously upgraded to remain at
   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260