Page 242 - Marine Structural Design
P. 242

218                                                      Part II Ultimate Strength

                     The pre-buckling deformations of cylinders are highly non-linear due to ovalization of the
                     cross-section.

                 Brazier  (1927)  was  the  first  researcher who  derived  elastic  bending  moment  and  cross-
                 sectional ovalization as a  hction of curvature in  elasticity. He  found that the maximum
                 moment is reached when critical stress is
                                Et
                      cJE 0.33  -                                                    (1 1.20)
                         =
                                r
                 However,  in  plastic  region,  the  buckling  strain  for  cylinders  in  pure  bending  may  be
                 substantially  higher  than  that  given  by  plastic  buckling  theory  for  cylinders  in  pure
                 compression. Many researchers have been trying to derive mathematical solutions for inelastic
                 cylinders in pure bending (see Ades, 1957 and Gellin, 1980).  Unfortunately no one has been
                 successful so far.
                 The effect of boundary conditions may also play an important role affecting buckling strength
                 of un-stiffened short shells under bending. The shorter the cylinder, the higher the buckling
                 strength is. This is because pre-buckling deformation, which is less for shorter cylinder, may
                 reduce shell buckling strength. When the length of the cylinder is long enough, the bending
                 strength may be close to those given by Beazier (1927), Ades (1957) and Gellin (1980).
                  11.2.4  External Lateral Pressure
                 In the pre-buckling state, the external pressure sets up compressive membrane stresses in the
                 meridian direction. Retaining only the linear terms in Eq. (1 1.3):
                      Ne = -Pr                                                       (11.21)
                 Introducing Eq.(l1.21)  into Eq. (1 1.8) yields the following stability equation:
                             Et a'w   1
                      DV8~+F-+-pV4                                                   (1 1.22)
                             r  ax4  r
                 The displacement hction is of the same form as the axial compression.  Introducing Eq.
                 (1 1.22) yields:

                                                                                     (1 1.23)


                 where one axial wave (m = 1) gives the lowest buckling load. The last term is interpreted to be
                 the buckling coefficient, ke . The  smallest value  of k, may be  determined by  trial.  If  Ti is
                 assumed large (>>1), analytically minimizing Eq. (1 1.23) gives:
                      ke=--&                                                         (11.24)
                          4&
                           3R
                 The approximate buckling coefficient valid for small and medium values of Znow reads:

                                                                                     (11.25)

                 The  first  term  is  identical  to  the  buckling  coefficient  of  a  long  plane  plate.  When  l/r
                 approaches infinity, Eq. (1 1.23) reduces to:
   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247