Page 245 - Marine Structural Design
P. 245

Chapter I I  Ultimate Strength of Cylindrical Shells                   22 1


                 cylindrical supports.  More refined analyses are now available which, for example, consider
                 the  influence of the  ring  frames on  the deformations before and  during buckling.  These
                 analyses show that  pE becomes inaccurate for closely spaced frames.  Nevertheless, the Von
                 Mises expression is still widely used because it can be represented in a relatively simple form
                 and it is in most cases only slightly conservative.
                 General Instability
                 Due to the catastrophic post-collapse characteristics associated with this failure mode, design
                 codes require the  effective moment  of inertia for the ring  stiffeners with  associated  shell
                 plating to be sufficiently high so that the ratio of general and local elastic buckling stresses is
                 1.2 (e.g. ASME (1980) Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code).
                 Ring Stiffener Failure
                 Ring stiffener failure may occur as torsional buckling or tripping of the stiffeners, seriously
                 weakening the resistance of the shell to general instability. Therefore, design codes specify
                 requirements on the ring stiffener geometry to prevent this type of failure from occurring.
                 Imperfections in the  form of lateral deformations of the ring  stiffeners may have a strong
                 detrimental  effect  in  reducing  the  stiffener’s resistance  to  torsional  buckling.  Similar to
                 tripping of stiffened plates, fabrication tolerance has been established on such imperfections.
                 11.3.3  Combined Axial Compression and Pressure

                 The strength of ringer stiffened cylinders under  combined axial compression and  external
                 pressure may be expressed as:

                                                                                    (1 1.33)


                 Recommendations by  various  codes  are  found  differing widely,  ranging  from  the  linear
                 interaction (m = n = 1) recommended by ECCS (1976) to a circular one (m = n = 2) required
                 by DNV (2000).  The ASME Code Case N-284  suggests a combination of straight lines and
                 parabolas that appears to agree quite well with test data.  Das et a1 (2001) suggested that the
                 parabola (m = 1, n = 2) offers the best fit to available data and is very close to the ASME
                 recommendations.

                 11.4  Buckling of Stringer and Ring Stiffened Shells

                 11.4.1  Axial Compression
                 General
                 This section is based on simplifications to Faulkner et a1 (1983), Ellinas (1984),  Das et a1
                 (1992) and  Das  et  a1  (2001).  Stinger-stiffened cylinder buckling is  usually the  governing
                 failure mode. Other failure modes such as local panel buckling, local stiffener tripping and
                 general instability may  also  occur, see Ellinas (1984).  In  many practical design situations,
                 buckling of stringer and ring stiffened shells is assessed as buckling of stiffened plates using
                 formulation presented in Part II Chapterlo.
   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250