Page 135 - Matrices theory and applications
P. 135

118
                              from which we obtain
                                                         g(t) − g(0)
                                                     lim
                                                                   = A.
                                                             t
                                                     t→0
                              We conclude that g has a derivative at t =0, with g (0) = A.Using the

                              functional equation (7.2), we then obtain that g is differentiable everywhere,
                              with  7. Exponential of a Matrix, Polar Decomposition, and Classical Groups
                                                         g(t)g(s) − g(t)
                                               g (t) = lim            = g(t)A.

                                                     s→0       s
                              We observe that we also have
                                                         g(s)g(t) − g(t)

                                               g (t) = lim            = Ag(t).
                                                     s→0       s
                              From either of these differential equations we see that g is actually infinitely
                              differentiable. We shall retain the formula
                                                d
                                                  exp tA = A exp tA =(exp tA)A.           (7.3)
                                               dt
                              This differential equation is sometimes the most practical way to compute
                              the exponential of a matrix. This is of particular relevance when A has real
                              entries but has at least one nonreal eigenvalue if one wishes to avoid the
                              use of complex numbers.
                              Proposition 7.2.2 For every A ∈ M n (CC),
                                                     det exp A =exp Tr A.                 (7.4)
                                Proof
                                We could deduce (7.4) directly from (7.3). Here is a more elementary
                              proof. We begin with a reduction of A of the form A = P −1 TP,where T
                                                      k
                              is upper triangular. Since T is still triangular, with diagonal entries equal
                                 k
                              to t ,exp T is triangular too, with diagonal entries equal to expt jj . Hence
                                 jj

                                          det exp T =  exp t jj =exp  t jj =exp Tr T.
                                                     j              j
                              This is the expected formula, since exp A = P −1 (exp T )P.
                                        ∗ k
                                                                                         ∗
                                                  k ∗
                                Since (M )  =(M ) , we see easily that (exp M) ∗  =exp(M ). In
                              particular, the exponential of a skew-Hermitian matrix is unitary, for then
                                                           ∗
                                           ∗
                                    (exp M) exp M =exp(M )exp M =exp(−M)exp M = I n .
                              Similarly, the exponential of a Hermitian matrix is Hermitian positive
                              definite, because
                                                                   ∗
                                                              1         1
                                                 exp M =  exp M     exp M.
                                                              2         2
   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140