Page 189 - Matrix Analysis & Applied Linear Algebra
P. 189

184              Chapter 4                                              Vector Spaces
                   Example 4.3.3

                                    Diagonal Dominance. A matrix A n×n is said to be diagonally dominant
                                    whenever
                                                            n

                                                     |a ii | >  |a ij | for each i =1, 2,...,n.
                                                           j=1
                                                           j =i
                                    That is, the magnitude of each diagonal entry exceeds the sum of the magni-
                                    tudes of the off-diagonal entries in the corresponding row. Diagonally dominant
                                    matrices occur naturally in a wide variety of practical applications, and when
                                    solving a diagonally dominant system by Gaussian elimination, partial pivoting
                                    is never required—you are asked to provide the details in Exercise 4.3.15.
                                    Problem: In 1900, Minkowski (p. 278) discovered that all diagonally dominant
                                    matrices are nonsingular. Establish the validity of Minkowski’s result.
                                    Solution: The strategy is to prove that if A is diagonally dominant, then
                                    N (A)= {0}, so that (4.3.2) together with (4.3.6) will provide the desired
                                    conclusion. Use an indirect argument—suppose there exists a vector x  = 0 such
                                    that Ax = 0, and assume that x k is the entry of maximum magnitude in x.
                                    Focus on the k th  component of Ax, and write the equation A k∗ x =0 as

                                                                        n

                                                             a kk x k = −  a kj x j .
                                                                       j=1
                                                                       j =k

                                    Taking absolute values of both sides and using the triangle inequality together
                                    with the fact that |x j |≤|x k | for each j produces

                                                   n           n           n               n


                                                     a kj x j ≤  |a kj x j | =  |a kj ||x j |≤  |a kj |  |x k |.
                                      |a kk ||x k | =

                                                  j=1         j=1         j=1             j=1
                                                  j =k        j =k        j =k            j =k
                                    But this implies that
                                                                       n

                                                               |a kk |≤  |a kj |,
                                                                      j=1
                                                                      j =k
                                    which violates the hypothesis that A is diagonally dominant. Therefore, the
                                    assumption that there exists a nonzero vector in N (A) must be false, so we
                                    may conclude that N (A)= {0}, and hence A is nonsingular.
                                    Note: An alternate solution is given in Example 7.1.6 on p. 499.
   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194