Page 388 - Matrix Analysis & Applied Linear Algebra
P. 388

384              Chapter 5                    Norms, Inner Products, and Orthogonality


                                    Prove these by arguing (5.9.2) =⇒ (5.9.3) =⇒  (5.9.4) =⇒ (5.9.2).
                                    Proof of (5.9.2) =⇒ (5.9.3).  First recall from (4.4.19) that
                                              dim V = dim (X + Y)= dim X + dim Y− dim (X∩ Y) .
                                    If V = X⊕ Y, then X∩ Y = 0, and thus dim V = dim X + dim Y. To prove
                                    (5.9.3), suppose there are two ways to represent a vector v ∈V as “something
                                    from X plus something from Y. ”If v = x 1 + y 1 = x 2 + y 2 , where x 1 , x 2 ∈X
                                    and y 1 , y 2 ∈Y, then
                                                                            
                                                                x 1 − x 2 ∈X 
                                        x 1 − x 2 = y 2 − y 1  =⇒    and        =⇒ x 1 − x 2 ∈X ∩ Y.
                                                                            
                                                                  x 1 − x 2 ∈Y
                                    But X∩ Y = 0, so x 1 = x 2 and y 1 = y 2 .
                                    Proof of (5.9.3) =⇒ (5.9.4).  The hypothesis insures that V = X + Y, and we
                                    know from (4.1.2) that B X ∪B Y spans X +Y, so B X ∪B Y must be a spanning
                                    set for V. To prove B X ∪B Y is linearly independent, let B X = {x 1 , x 2 ,..., x r }
                                    and B Y = {y 1 , y 2 ,..., y s } , and suppose that
                                                                 r        s

                                                            0 =    α i x i +  β j y j .
                                                                i=1      j=1
                                    This is one way to express 0 as “something from X plus something from Y, ”
                                    while 0 = 0 + 0 is another way. Consequently, (5.9.3) guarantees that
                                                        r                   s

                                                          α i x i = 0  and    β j y j = 0,
                                                       i=1                 j=1
                                    and hence α 1 = α 2 = ··· = α r =0 and β 1 = β 2 = ··· = β s =0 because
                                    B X and B Y are both linearly independent. Therefore, B X ∪B Y is linearly
                                    independent, and hence it is a basis for V.
                                    Proof of (5.9.4) =⇒ (5.9.2).  If B X ∪B Y is a basis for V, then B X ∪B Y is a
                                    linearly independent set. This together with the fact that B X ∪B Y always spans
                                    X + Y means B X ∪B Y is a basis for X + Y as well as for V. Consequently,
                                    V = X + Y, and hence
                                       dim X + dim Y = dim V = dim(X + Y)= dim X + dim Y− dim (X∩ Y) ,
                                    so dim (X∩ Y)= 0 or, equivalently, X∩ Y = 0.
                                        If V = X⊕ Y, then (5.9.3) says there is one and only one way to resolve
                                    each v ∈V into an “X -component” and a “Y-component” so that v = x + y.
                                    These two components of v have a definite geometrical interpretation. Look
                                                               3
                                    back at Figure 5.9.1 in which   = X⊕ Y, where X is a plane and Y is a line
                                    outside the plane, and notice that x (the X -component of v )is the result of
                                    projecting v onto X along a line parallel to Y, and y (the Y-component of
                                    v )is obtained by projecting v onto Y along a line parallel to X. This leads
                                    to the following formal definition of a projection.
   383   384   385   386   387   388   389   390   391   392   393