Page 142 - Mechanism and Theory in Organic Chemistry
P. 142

Strengths of Weak Br~lnsted Bases   131

       etc.), A to the free base form, S to some base present in the solvent (H,O  mole-
       cules or HS04- ions), and SH+ to the conjugate acids of these species (H30+,
       H2S04). Note that the nature of S and SH+ is not well defined, since in mixed
       solvents each  consists of more  than one species; however,  the proton-donating
       ability of  SH+ and  the  proton-accepting  ability  of  S, whatever  they may  be,
       together  determine  the  effectiveness of  the  particular  solvent  mixture  in  pro-
       tonating the base A, and so are characteristic of that solvent mixture. It is  this
       "protonation  effectiveness"  that Hammett and Deyrup first set out to measure.
           The next  step is  to  choose a  series of  bases, A,, A,,  A,.  . ., A,,  . . ., each
       weaker than the previous one. We also require that these substances absorb light
       in the visible or ultraviolet  region,  and  that the absorption  spectra  of the free
       bases differ from the spectra of their respective conjugate acids. The reason for
       this  latter  requirement  is  that we  must  have  some means  of  determining  the
       concentrations  [A]  and  [AH+] for  each  of the base-conjugate  acid  pairs;  the
       visible-ultraviolet spectrophotometric method  is  convenient  and is  the one that
       has been employed most frequently, although there are other methods. Hammett
       and Deyrup picked  as their series of bases various substituted anilines with  in-
       creasing numbers  of  electron-withdrawing  substituents  to  provide  successively
       weaker bases.  It is essential to the method that the first base, A,,  be sufficiently
       strong that the acid dissociation constant of its conjugate acid can be determined
       in pure water.  In dilute aqueous solution, SH+ in Equation 3.28 is H,O+,  S is
       H,O,  and the activity coefficients approach unity, so the problem reduces to the
       relatively straightforward one discussed in Section 3.1. We next go to a solvent
       containing a small amount of sulfuric acid, for example 10 percent of H,SO,,  in
       which the base A, will still give appreciable concentrations of both the conjugate
       acid and conjugate base forms, and that will also allow measurements to be made
       on the weaker base A,,  which is too weak to give measurable amounts of A,H+
       in pure water.
           We may now write two equations of the type 3.30 describing the behavior
       of our two bases in the new solvent  :








       Note that KaAIH+ is known from the measurements in dilute water solution; we
       have defined the quantities in the equations in such a way that the K,'s  are truly
       constants  (at constant  temperature  and  pressure),  and  all  nonideal  behavior
       resulting from changing the solvent is incorporated into the activities. Further-
       more, the concentrations [A,],  [A,H +], [A,],  [A,H  +] are directly  measurable
       spectrophotometrically. If we divide Equation 3.31 by Equation 3.32, we obtain
       Equation 3.33  :



       In Equation 3.33 all quantities are known or measurable except KaAz,+ and the
       ratio involving activity coefficients.
   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147