Page 286 - Media Effects Advances in Theory and Research
P. 286

10. EFFECTS OF MEDIA VIOLENCE                                  275

        tion, some researchers have attempted to employ this method outside the
        confines of the laboratory using methods appropriate for field research.
           Berkowitz and his associates have conducted a number of field experi-
        ments in institutions for delinquent boys (Leyens, Parke, Camino, &
        Berkowitz, 1975; Parke, Berkowitz, Leyens, West, & Sebastian, 1977).
        These experiments assessed physical and verbal aggression in boys who
        had been assigned to watch media violence for several weeks and com-
        pared their levels of aggression with similar boys who did not watch vio-
        lence. The findings of these studies converged with laboratory investiga-
        tions; boys who watched media violence were more likely to engage in
        aggressive behavior.
           The work of Williams (1986) is especially noteworthy in that she was
        able to study changes in aggression that occurred naturally over several
        years in a Canadian town that initially had no access to TV signals but,
        over the course of the natural experiment, gained TV access. The results
        of Williams’ research converged with the findings of the laboratory stud-
        ies: increases in exposure to media violence lead to increases in aggres-
        sive behavior. Unfortunately, because of the pervasiveness of TV signals
        today, the possibility of gathering more evidence of this type is steadily
        decreasing.
           The experimental evidence on the causal impact of media violence
        has been so consistent in favor of the conclusion that exposure causes
        increased aggression that fewer experiments have been conducted in
        recent years. However, one recent experiment that was reported by Zill-
        mann and Weaver (1999) exposed participants to either four consecu-
        tive days of gratuitious violence or nonviolence in the form of feature
        films. As in earlier experimental results, their findings showed that the
        participants who saw the violent films were more hostile in their behav-
        ior subsequent to exposure. Unlike prior experiments, which tended to
        show that participants would only show hostility toward a person who
        had provoked them earlier, Zillmann and Weaver’s participants
        showed such hostility regardless of whether they had been provoked
        earlier or not.
           Some researchers have attempted to study the possible facilitation of
        aggression through exposure to media violence by recourse to the natural
        experiment. Most notable among these attempts are studies by Phillips
        (1979, 1983, 1986) and Centerwall (1989). According to Centerwall, prior
        to television’s emergence in the United States, the national homicide rate
        was 3 per 100,000. By 1974, the homicide rate had doubled. Centerwall
        argues that this increase is directly linked to massive exposure to televi-
        sion throughout the culture. He notes that essentially the same kind of
        increase in homicides occurred in Canada. Moreover, he argues that
        despite its similarities on nearly any variable of interest, homicides did
   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291