Page 325 - Media Effects Advances in Theory and Research
P. 325

314                                              HARRIS AND SCOTT

        has become the “normal” anchor (Tversky & Kahneman, 1974) to which
        real people are compared.
           Such effects are not limited to men. Relative to control groups, both men
        and women who watched weekly pornographic films later reported less
        satisfaction with the affection, physical appearance, sexual curiosity, and
        sexual performance of their real-life partners (Zillmann & Bryant, 1988a,
        1988b). They also saw sex without emotional involvement as being rela-
        tively more important than did the control group, and they showed greater
        acceptance of premarital and extramarital sex and placed lesser value on
        marriage and monogamy. They also reported less desire to have children
        and greater acceptance of male dominance and female submission.
           Using the same methodology of showing weekly films and questioning
        1 to 3 weeks later, Zillmann and Bryant (1982, 1984) found that partici-
        pants watching sexually explicit films overestimated the frequency of sex-
        ual practices like fellatio, cunnilingus, anal intercourse, sadomasochism,
        and bestiality in the general population, relative to perceptions of a con-
        trol group seeing nonsexual films. This may reflect the cognitive heuristic
        of availability, whereby we judge the frequency of occurrence of various
        activities by the ease with which we can generate examples (Taylor, 1982;
        Tversky & Kahneman, 1973, 1974). Recent exposure to vivid media
        instances thus leads to an overestimation of such occurrences in the real
        world and a perceived reality substantially at odds with reality.
           The sexual material need not even be explicit or graphic to help shape
        attitudes. Bryant and Rockwell (1994) found that, compared to controls,
        adolescents who watched a heavy diet of highly sexual prime-time pro-
        grams were more lenient in their judgment about sexual impropriety and
        how much a victim had been wronged, although these effects were
        greatly attenuated by open family communication and active critical
        viewing.
           One may not even need pictures. In one study all-verbal print descrip-
        tions of sex (e.g., the Penthouse Advisor column) were actually more con-
        ducive than photos to fantasizing about one’s own partner (Dermer &
        Pyszczynski, 1978). Many issues require further study, and the effects of
        newer types of sexual media such as phone sex and Internet pornography
        are still largely unknown.

        Behavioral Effects

           Teaching New Behaviors. Beyond arousal and attitude change, con-
        suming sexual media also has effects on behavior. On the one hand, the
        media may actually teach new behaviors, including potentially some
        extremely violent and destructive ones.  Although examples like men
        watching a movie depicting a gang rape on a pool table and soon afterward
   320   321   322   323   324   325   326   327   328   329   330