Page 35 - Media Effects Advances in Theory and Research
P. 35

24                                                      ZILLMANN

           In case population parameters are not known, the degree of representa-
        tion is not discernible. Presumptions about variation in the event popula-
        tion might be used as a guide for exemplification. However, to the degree
        that such presumptions are erroneous, exemplar samples can only mis-
        represent the event population.
           The representation of event populations by media exemplifications has
        been a prominent domain of inquiry for some time. In a groundbreaking
        investigation, Berelson and Salter (1946) introduced the comparative
        assessment of exemplar ratios and ratios of the exemplified events. Specif-
        ically, these investigators demonstrated bias in the representation of major-
        ity and minority Americans in magazine fiction by relating the proportions
        of ethnically identified protagonists to the proportions of the respective
        ethnic groups in the general population. Minorities were found to be
        grossly underrepresented as heroes, the majority grossly overrepresented.
           Gerbner and his collaborators (e.g., Gerbner, Gross, Morgan, & Sig-
        norielli, 1986) have applied this technique to exemplifications in prime-
        time television and recorded a host of misrepresentations. For instance, in
        the cast of characters, men were vastly overexemplified, women vastly
        underexemplified. In fact, the portrayal of men outnumbered that of
        women by a factor of three. Teens and the elderly were severely underex-
        emplified. The exemplification of minorities was found to be similarly
        nonrepresentative, with Blacks reaching only three-fourths and Hispanic
        Americans only one-third of their presence in the population. Regarding
        the overrepresentation of crime and its curtailment in fiction, the law
        enforcement personnel alone outnumbered all blue-collar and service
        workers by a far margin.
           Greenberg, Simmons, Hogan, and Atkin (1980) analogously assessed
        television characters by a set of their features and then compared the char-
        acters’ prevalence to census data. Among other things, these investigators
        reported an underrepresentation of women, children, older people,
        craftspersons, and clericals, as well as an overrepresentation of managers
        and persons ages 20 to 50.
           The assessment of representation is not limited, however, to compar-
        isons with segments of the populace. Exemplifications can be related to all
        situations for which reliable parameters exist. For instance, Dominick
        (1973) compared the portrayal of crime on prime-time television with
        crime statistics and observed a gross overrepresentation of violent crime,
        of assault and murder in particular. Comparisons also can be made
        against conceptually compelling standards. Stocking, Sapolsky, and Zill-
        mann (1977), for example, ascertained the frequency of intergender put-
        downs in prime-time comedy and observed, counter to prevalent beliefs
        at the time, that men were as much the butt of jokes delivered by women
        as women were of jokes delivered by men. Moreover, comparisons have
   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40