Page 40 - Membranes for Industrial Wastewater Recovery and Re-Use
P. 40

20  Membranes for lndustrial  Wastewater Recovery and Re-use


           Table 2.3  Commercially available phase inversion polymeric membrane materials
           Polymera   Advantages           Disadvantages              Processb
           CA       Chlorine resistant     Susceptible to alkaline hydrolysis   RO, NF. UF
                    Inexpensive            atpH>6
                    More fouling resistant than PA   Susceptible to biodegradation
                                           Limited thermal and chemical
                                           stability
                                           Limited permselectivity  (-9  5%
                                           rejection)
                                           Slightly lower permeability
           PA       More all-round stability than CA  Very limited chlorine tolerance   RO, NF
                    More permselectivity than CA   (<0.1 mg1-I)
           PAN      High resistance to hydrolysis   Hydrophobic       UF, RO substr.
                    High resistance to oxidation   Requires copolymers to make
                                           less brittle
           PSU, PES   Very good all-round stability   Hydrophobic     UF. RO substr.
                    Mechanically strong
           PVDF,    Extremely high chemical   Highly hydrophobic      UF, MF
           PTFE     stability              Limited mechanical stability
                    High thermal stability   Limited intrinsic permeability
                                           Expensive
           PEI      High chemical stability   Hydrophobic             UF, RO
                    Very high thermal stability   Less solvent resistant than PVDF   substr.
                    Mechanically strong    Poorer alkaline stability than
                                           PSU or PAN
           PP       Inexpensive            Hydrophobic                UF, MF

           a  CA,  cellulose  acetate  (predominantly  di-  or  tri-acetate);  PA,  polyamide  (aromatic):  PAN,
           polyacrylonitrile: PSU, polysulphone: PES, poly(ether sulphone): PVDF, poly(viny1idene fluoride); PTFE,
           polytetrafluoroethane: PEI, polyetherimide; PP, polypropylene.
            Most usual application in bold type.



           oxidative attack and hydrolytic degradation promoted by extremes of pH, is their
           hydrophobicity.  This makes  them very  susceptible to non-specific  adsorption
           of hydrophobic contaminants in the water, which reduce the permeability of the
           membrane.  This  phenomenon,  termed  fouling,  imposes  a  very  significant
           constraint on the operation  of  all membrane processes. Much  developmental
           work  has been  conducted  in producing  chemically  and mechanically  robust
           membranes  with  hydrophilic  surfaces  that  are  therefore  less  susceptible  to
           fouling by common natural hydrophobic materials such as proteins.
             Surface modification can take place by four recognised routes:

             0  chemical oxidation,
             0  organic chemical reaction,
             0  plasma treatment, and
             0  grafting.
             Chemical oxidation, using standard oxidative chemicals such as chromic or
           nitric acid, converts surface groups such as alkenes and esters to hydroxyl and
   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45