Page 67 - Membranes for Industrial Wastewater Recovery and Re-Use
P. 67

Membrane technology  47

           Table 2.10  Empirical filtration expressions for activated sludge
           _.                                          _.
           Application/derivation   Expressiond               Reference
                                              AP
           Protein              I=                            Fane (1 986)
                                   WI[R~+R/M,*(~ -e-klt)  +RilMbl]
                                                              Fane (1 9 86)

                                        A  1'
           Classical cake liltration   I=                     Changeful. (2001):
                                   K(Rm + UCMMS)              Shimizurf al. (1993)
           Concentration        J = a + b l0gCooc             Ishiguro etnl. (1994)
           polarisation
                                              AP
           Sidestream MBR       I=                            Sat0 and Ishii (1 99 1)
                                   w(Rm + 843AP~~~C~~~p0
                                                       32h)
                                                      )
                                        k RdCMLss - CMLVSS)
           Sidestream MBR       1 = 11) exp                   Krauth and Staab (1993)
                                             CMLVSS
           HF submerged MBR     1 = kUa@q&s                   Shimizuetal. (1996)
            a, b, k, empirical constants; C, concentration: I(,, initial flux: kj 2.3, empirical first-order rate constants:
              boundary  layer cake deposit: AI&*.  maximum  cake  deposit (mass per  unit area):  R'bl,  specific
           L&,
           boundary  layer  resistance:  Ua. approach  velocity,  air:  rp,  membrane  geometric  hindrance  factor
           (membrane geometry dependent). Subscripts: COD, chemical oxygen demand: DOC, dissolved organic
           carbon: ML(V)SS. mixed liquor (volatile) suspended solids.
             0  the  physical  properties  of  the liquid,  which  for  most  water  treatment
                processes change only marginally with chemical water quality and can
                normally be accurately expressed as a function of temperature,
             0   the shape and size of the flow channels within the module, and
             0   the mean velocity of liquid flowing through the channels.

             The rate at which ions accumulate in the stagnant film is simply determined
           by  the flux and the rejection. Therefore, provided  the system is well defined,
           the degree of concentration polarisation can be calculated and its effects on the
           operation of the membrane process assessed. Mathematical description proceeds
           by conducting a material balance at the membrane, where the build-up of solute
           at the interface is countered by the diffusive flux of solute away from membrane.
           This essentially entails the balancing of four fluxes:

             0  back  diffusion of  solute away from the membrane by Fick's first law of
                diffusion,  which  states  that  the  diffusion  rate  is  proportional  to  the
                concentration gradient,
             0   convective transport of the solute to the membrane,
             0   convective diffusion of the solute through the membrane, and
             0   convective diffusion of permeate through membrane.

             Assuming a one-dimensional system (i.e. no Iongitudinal mass transfer) and a
           constant value 6 for the boundary layer thickness (Fig. 2.1 8), the concentration
           polarisation under steady-state conditions based on film theory can be defined as:
   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72