Page 108 - Microaggressions in Everyday Live Race, Gender, and Sexual Orientation
P. 108

82  the microaggression process model

               and you ’ re forced to conform in a certain way, but you kind of hate to do it. ”   Another
               described it in the following way:  “ there ’ s a part of me that always feels like I ’ m

               pretending at my job  . . .  . I always feel like it ’ s a mask  . . .  you can ’ t really say what ’ s
               on your mind, or you have to fi lter it through so many lenses till it comes out sound-
               ing acceptable to whoever ’ s listening. ”



                   Pressure to Represent One ’ s Group
                 A very common experience reported by people of color is a powerful pres-
               sure to represent their groups well. They had a heightened awareness that
               every mistake, every failing, and every defi ciency exhibited by them would
               be attributed to their respective minority groups. For example, one par-
               ticipant relayed her feeling that any mistakes she makes will affect Black
               women who come after her in the job:  “ If I screw up, every Black woman after

               me, or every Black person after me is going to have to take it, because I screwed

               up  . . .  so I carry that pressure with me. ”  Some participants felt an increased
               pressure to act or perform in a certain way so as not to confi rm particular
               stereotypes about their group. For example,  “ as a Black woman, you have
               to put in that extra because maybe their expectations of you are going to be

               lower. ” As will be reported shortly, this latter phenomenon has been labeled
                “ stereotype threat ”  and its effects can have devastating consequences for
               people of color and women (Cardinu, Maass, Rosabianca,  &  Kiesner, 2005;
               Steele, 2003; Steele et al., 2002).
                    In conclusion, our studies (Sue, Capodilupo,  &  Holder, 2008; Sue, Lin,
               Torino, et al., 2009; Sue, Nadal, et al., 2008) identifi ed five general phases which

               could be logically ordered from inception to consequence in a sequential fash-
               ion: Incident →   Perception →   Reaction → Interpretation → Consequence. It
               is important to note, however, that these phases did not arise sequentially. In
               other words, responses from people of color might begin with a discussion
               of their reactions before addressing their perceptions and interpretations of
               the incidents. We must entertain the possibility that these phases may occur
               in a different order, overlap with one another, be cyclical, and/or interact in a
               more complex manner.
                    Nevertheless, it is safe to say that potential microaggressive incidents set
               in motion a chain of events that may be energy - depleting and/or disruptive
               to cognitive, emotional, and behavioral domains (Purdie - Vaughns et al., 2008;
               Salvatore  &  Shelton, 2007; Sue, Lin, Torino, et al., 2009). Perceptual questioning











                                                                                    1/19/10   6:09:11 PM
          c04.indd   82
          c04.indd   82                                                             1/19/10   6:09:11 PM
   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113