Page 126 - Microaggressions in Everyday Live Race, Gender, and Sexual Orientation
P. 126

100  microaggressive stress

               validity, evidence now points to social and psychological factors as important
               contributors as well: gender - role conflicts; sexism in overt, covert, and subtle

               forms; subservience to men; lack of educational opportunities; lower sense of
               self - control; and sexual and child abuse (Capodilupo et al., in press; Hill  &
               Fisher, 2008; D. Sue, Sue,  &  Sue, 2010).
                   A significant relationship between depression and subjective well - being also

               seems to exist between perceived discrimination and that of depression among
               African Americans, Asian Americans,  and  Latino/a Americans  (Hwang   &
               Goto, 2008; Utsey et al., 2008; Williams, Neighbors,  &  Jackson, 2003). Indeed,
               rates of depression have been found to be higher for Native Americans and
               Southeast Asians (Vega  &  Rumbaut, 1991; Chung  &  Okazaki, 1991). Recall that
               researchers believe that stressors that humiliate tended to be correlated with
               depressive disorders, while stressors that produce fear are associated with anxi-
               ety disorders. As microaggressions have been described as demeaning, insulting,
               and humiliating, one can understand how these race - related stressors may
               produce depression and lead to negative subjective feelings in people of color.


                   Cognitive Effects of Microaggressive Stressors

                Racism, sexism, and heterosexism affect many more aspects of mental health
               functioning than just depression and feelings of subjective well - being.  The
               cumulative impact of chronic stressors diminishes the quality of life; lowers
               life satisfaction, happiness, and self - esteem; increases cultural mistrust, feelings
               of alienation, anxiety, and feelings of loss, helplessness, and racial rage; and
               may result in fatigue and exhaustion (Clark et al., 1999; Harrell, 2000; Jackson
               et al., 1992; Jackson et al., 1995; Jones, 1997; Sue, 2003; Ponterotto, Utsey,  &
               Pedersen, 2006). We have already seen how stress affects the biological and
               physical well - being of marginalized groups. On a biological level, stress
               depresses the immune system and makes people more susceptible to catching

               colds and other illnesses. We briefly turn our attention now to how stress impacts
               the cognitive functioning of marginalized groups.
                    In Chapter  4 , we describe how a microaggression often sets off a chain of
               cognitive processes aimed at attempting to understand and make sense of the
               incident. The greater the ambiguity of microaggressions, the more diffi cult it
               is for the target to determine the meaning of the conflicting messages. Thus,

               a request from a White teacher to an Asian American student to move to the
               blackboard and show other students how to solve a math problem, because
                 “ You people are good at that, ”  may provoke an internal thought process










                                                                                    1/19/10   6:10:09 PM
          c05.indd   100
          c05.indd   100                                                            1/19/10   6:10:09 PM
   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131