Page 129 - Microaggressions in Everyday Live Race, Gender, and Sexual Orientation
P. 129

The Effects of Microaggressive Stress  103

                     microaggressions that are environmentally, verbally, and behaviorally directed
                     at them. The range of responding is immense and depends on many factors.
                     Some of the coping responses seem functional and adaptive (taking care of
                     the self and educating the perpetrator), while others may prove dysfunctional
                     and maladaptive (becoming depressed, overconsumption of alcohol, engaging in
                     risky sexual behavior, striking back in anger). Even when a behavior appears
                     functional in the moment — deciding to do nothing for fear of retaliation — we
                     have seen how long - term consequences can be detrimental to both the bio-
                     logical and psychological well - being of the person.
                         Microaggressions can signal a hostile and invalidating climate, threaten the
                     physical safety, self - esteem, and racial/gender/sexual identity of the target,
                     and be oppressive. Forced compliance (either accept White, straight, and male

                     definitions of the situation or suffer the consequences) is a chronic demand
                     placed on marginalized groups in this society. We outline below fi ve observed
                     reactions that have either adaptive or maladaptive implications: (1) hyper-
                     vigilance and skepticism, (2) forced compliance (surviving or being coopted),
                     (3) rage and anger, (4) fatigue and hopelessness, and (5) strength through
                     adversity.


                       Hypervigilance and Skepticism
                      Microaggressive stressors may partially explain the  “ cultural mistrust ”  or
                       “ healthy paranoia ”  in the form of suspiciousness, skepticism, and hyper-
                     vigilance directed toward majority group members (Ridley, 2005; Sue  &  Sue,
                     2008). Some have referred to this form of behavior as  “ anticipatory racism
                     reaction ”  developed because of multiple experiences of stereotyping, prejudice,
                     and discrimination (Ponterotto et al., 2006). In the area of race relations, for
                     example, people of color have experienced historical racism through govern-
                     mental actions that include forced enslavement, taking of lands from indigenous
                     groups, and the incarceration of Japanese Americans.
                         This historical racist legacy is compounded by the everyday subtle forms
                     of racism that may deprive people of color equal access and opportunity.
                     Thus the lack of trust or skepticism exhibited by many marginalized groups
                     toward those in the majority society has become a healthy functional sur-
                     vival mechanism as well as a sanity check. On the functional end, it is an
                     adaptive mechanism used to survive and even thrive, but on the other side,
                     it may result in an inability to form close relations with members of the
                     majority culture. In the extreme case, marginalized group members may











                                                                                    1/19/10   6:10:09 PM
          c05.indd   103                                                            1/19/10   6:10:09 PM
          c05.indd   103
   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134