Page 283 - Microaggressions in Everyday Live Race, Gender, and Sexual Orientation
P. 283

Microaggressive Impact on Mental Health Practice  257

                     and effort, (6) engages in dysfunctional helping/patronization, and (7) denies
                     any individual bias or racism. All of these beliefs or assumptions, if acted
                     upon by the caseworker, might constitute various forms of racial microaggres-
                     sions that would impede the therapeutic relationship. Let ’ s use the above case
                     study to illustrate how microaggressions impact clients, the counseling process,
                     establishment of rapport, and the working alliance.

                         Racial Microaggression Number One: Blackness
                     Is the Problem — Blame the Victim

                      It is quite obvious that the social work intern is sincere in his desire to help
                     the client. Yet, his worldview reflects a dichotomy between recognizing the

                     race of the client (African American) and attempting to avoid acknowledg-
                     ing it. The caseworker seems to believe the client ’ s race is the problem rather
                     than his unconscious perception of  “ blackness. ”  His statement that he tried
                     not to let Peter ’ s  “ being Black get in the way ”  of the session is a typical state-
                     ment often made by Whites who unconsciously subscribe to a belief that to
                     be different is to be bad, deviant, pathological, abnormal, or  “ the problem. ”
                     This assumption assumes that the locus of the problem resides internally with
                     Peter ’ s racial heritage, and stereotypes that are attributed to it. Often we hear
                     people talk about minorities as  “ problem people ” : the  “ Black problem, ”  the
                      “ Asian problem, ”  the  “ Gay problem, ”  the  “ immigrant problem, ”  or the  “ person
                     of color problem. ”  In reality, color is not the problem. It is society ’ s percep-
                     tion of color that more accurately represents the problem. In other words,
                     the locus of the problem (racism, sexism, and homophobia) resides not in
                     marginalized groups, but in the society at large.
                         Adding to the  “ blame the victim ”  mentality is the clash between the equating
                     of mental health with individualism, individual responsibility, and autonomy
                     (Sue  &  Sue, 2008). Because people are seen as being responsible for their own
                     actions and predicaments, clients are expected to  “ make decisions on their
                     own ”  and to  “ be primarily responsible for their fate in life. ”  The traditional
                     clinical role is to encourage self - exploration so that clients can act on their
                     own behalf. The individual - centered approach tends to view problems as
                     residing within the person. If something goes wrong, it is the client ’ s fault.
                     Faulty diagnosis is clearly seen in the caseworker ’ s words: Peter ’ s wanting
                     things handed to him on a  “ silver platter, ”  his  “ avoidance of responsibility, ”
                     and his  “ wanting to take the easy way out ”  are symbolic of social stereotypes
                     that Blacks are lazy and unmotivated. In previous chapters we pointed out










                                                                                    1/19/10   6:15:35 PM
          c12.indd   257                                                            1/19/10   6:15:35 PM
          c12.indd   257
   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288