Page 73 - Microaggressions in Everyday Live Race, Gender, and Sexual Orientation
P. 73

Clash of Racial Realities  47

                     betrayed because of her concern for the safety of fellow fliers, or the two

                     passengers of color who believe the actions were tinged with racial overtones?
                     This is not an easy question to answer and represents a true psychologi-
                     cal dilemma. There are, however, some studies and anecdotal observations
                     that may shed light on this question. It has been found, for example, that
                     (1) unconscious racial, gender, and sexual - orientation biases exist in many
                     mainstream individuals (Bonilla - Silva, 2006; Burn, Kadlac,  &  Rexer, 2005;
                     Dovidio et al., 2002; Fukuyama, Miville,  &  Funderburk, 2005; Swim, Hyers,
                     Cohen,  &  Ferguson, 2001), (2) they often appear in the form of unintentional
                     discrimination (Dovidio  &  Gaertner, 2000; Rowe, 1990; Sue, Lin, Torino,
                     Capodilupo,  &  Rivera, 2009), and (3) the most disempowered groups have a
                     more accurate assessment of reality, especially relating to whether discrimina-
                     tory behavior is bias - motivated (Hanna et al., 2000; Keltner  &  Robinson, 1996).
                        This last fi nding seems to make sense because it is consistent with the life
                     experience of marginalized groups. Women, for example, who work for a
                     primarily male - dominated company often say they must understand the think-
                     ing and mind - set of their male colleagues in order to do well in the company
                     (earn retention and promotion). They often complain that no such reciprocity
                     exists with male colleagues; for them to do well, they need not understand
                     the worldview of female coworkers! People of color and many LGBTs also
                     say that their individual and group survival is based on the ability to read the
                     minds of persons of other groups. To survive in a highly racist or homopho-
                     bic society, people of color and LGBTs must understand the thinking of the
                     dominant group. Forced to operate in a predominately White, Eurocentric,
                     male, and straight society, survival for people of color, women, and LGBTs
                     depends on their ability to accurately discern  “ the truth, ”  the potential biases
                     they are likely to encounter, and the thoughts and actions of those who hold
                     power over them. Some have suggested that people of color, for example,
                     have developed a heightened perceptual awareness that is derived from adver-
                     sity (Hanna et al., 2000; Sue, 2003). Thus, the hypervigilance in discerning the
                     motives, attitudes, and the often unintentional biased contradictions of White
                     Americans is perceived by marginalized groups not as  “ paranoia, ”  but rather
                     as functional survival skills.
                        Thus, in answering the question as to understanding racial realities, I pose
                     the following questions: If you want to understand sexism, do you ask men
                     or women? If you want to understand homophobia or heterosexism, do you
                     ask straights or gays? If you want to understand racism, do you ask Whites or











                                                                                    1/19/10   6:08:23 PM
          c03.indd   47                                                             1/19/10   6:08:23 PM
          c03.indd   47
   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78