Page 95 - Microaggressions in Everyday Live Race, Gender, and Sexual Orientation
P. 95

The Microaggression Process Model  69

                     Table 4.1  (Continued)
                     DOMAIN                     DOMAIN EXAMPLES
                                                “My date is looking for me to get a cab. But they
                                                keep passing. So it’s just constant humiliation. It’s
                                                just humiliation.”
                     Phase Four—Interpretation:   “They treated me like the angry black woman and
                     The meaning the participant   like afraid how I’m going to come back.”
                     makes of the incident,     “But subtle, it’s more like they want to fi nd out
                     answering such questions as:   what I know and who I am before they trust me
                     Why did the event occur?   with it.”
                     What were the person’s
                     intentions?

                     Phase Five—Consequence     “And I think I’ve learned in a lot of ways to sort of
                     for Individual: Behavioral,   shield myself from any kind of, like, personal hurt
                     emotive, or thought processes  that would come out of it. Like I don’t blame it on
                     which develop over time as a   myself, it’s not like ‘What’s wrong with me?’ It’s like,
                     result of said incident.   “Oh, that’s that White unconsciousness that they’re
                                                so well-trained in.’”


                     when a potential racial microaggression presents itself: Incident, Perception,
                     Reaction, Interpretation, and Consequence.


                         Phase One — The Potential Microaggressive Incident or Event

                      Potential microaggressive incidents set in motion a chain of psychological
                     events within recipients that may directly or indirectly effect their interpersonal
                     interactions. Incidents may be the result of (a) ongoing interactions between
                     perpetrators and recipients (discussions of topics between individuals or
                     groups of people during social events), (b) more distant and passive relation-
                     ships (overhearing comments made by a stranger in a subway), or (c) those in
                     which environmental cues signal a devaluation of group identities (all male
                     pictures of past CEOs in a board room). For African Americans, communications
                     regarding the following themes have been found to be especially offensive, but
                     very common (Sue, Nadal, et al., 2008):

                       •      Ascription of intellectual inferiority
                       •    Second - class citizenship
                       •    Assumption of criminality
                       •      Assumption of inferior status
                       •      Assumed universality of the Black experience
                       •      Assumed superiority of White cultural values/communication styles








                                                                                    1/19/10   6:09:07 PM
          c04.indd   69                                                             1/19/10   6:09:07 PM
          c04.indd   69
   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100