Page 97 - MODELING OF ASPHALT CONCRETE
P. 97

Overview of the Stif fness Characterization of Asphalt Concr ete    75


                                        D ∞
                                        Creep compliance Iog D(t)  D o  1  n












                                       D , D , t , n   Log (time)
                                           ∞
                                        o
                                             o
                    FIGURE 3-7  Creep compliance.
                    approaches the asymptote of D . The slope n can never be greater than 1.0. The creep
                                               ∞
                    compliance is related to the relaxation modulus. This is determined in a uniaxial test in
                    which a strain is imposed on the material and held constant. The stress in the material
                    then relaxes as the time after the strain was first applied increases. The relaxation
                    modulus is the time-dependent stress divided by the constant strain. Chapter 6 deals
                    exclusively with the relationship between this property and the creep compliance. At
                    this point it simply needs to be known that the theory of linear viscoelasticity may be
                    used to convert between any of the linear viscoelastic response functions as long as the
                    measurements actually represent linear viscoelastic behavior.
                    Surface Energies
                    The surface energies of the asphalt can be measured in a number of different test devices.
                    The instrument which was used in measuring the surface energies that are tabulated in
                    Table 3-1 were measured with the Wilhelmy plate apparatus. The apparatus is pictured
                    in Fig. 12-3, and a detailed explanation of the testing procedure is given there. There are
                    three components of surface energy: the nonpolar or Lifshitz-van der Waals, and the
                    Lewis acid and Lewis base polar components. There is a hysteresis effect between the
                    wetting and the dewetting surface energies. The wetting surface energies are associated
                    with the healing of the microfractures in the asphalt while the dewetting surface
                    energies are associated with the fracture of the asphalt. The total surface energy is made


                       Surface                      New Asphalt           Aged Asphalt
                       Energy
                       Components,
                       ergs/cm 2    Water     Wetting     Dewetting   Wetting    Dewetting
                       Γ LW         21.6        8.80      13.62       14.91        6.76
                       Γ –          25.5       1.50       18.87        1.74      15.28
                       Γ +          25.5       2.81       10.52        1.07      15.03
                       Γ AB         51.0       4.13       28.18        2.64      30.30
                       Γ TOTAL      72.6      12.93       41.80       17.55      37.06


                      TABLE 3-1  Wetting and Dewetting Surface Energies of Asphalt and Water
   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102