Page 272 - Multifunctional Photocatalytic Materials for Energy
P. 272

254                                Multifunctional Photocatalytic Materials for Energy

         11.3.1   Pure TiO 2  nanomaterials for hydrogen production

         Since Fujishima and Honda reported the possibility of photocatalytic WS on a TiO 2
         electrode years ago [173], people have made many efforts to broaden the photocata-
         lytic applications of TiO 2  in photodegradation of pollutants and photogenerated clean
         hydrogen fuel from water. Different nanostructured  TiO 2  materials containing 0D
         NPs, 1D NTAs, NWs, NRs, NFs, 2D NSs, 3D porous, and hierarchical hollow struc-
         tures have arisen, increasing interest in their uses in various fields, such as pollution
         degradation [174], energy from reduction of CO 2  [175,176], solar cells [177,178],
         supercapacitors [179,180], and biosensors [181–183]. Some typical works on photo-
         catalytic WS based on TiO 2 -based composites have been broadly reported. Yu's group
         utilized P25 for H 2  production from WS in an ethanol/water solution under UV light,
                                                    − 1
                                                 − 1
         but obtained a low generation rate of 13.7 mmol h  g  [184]. Seeking enhancement,
         Janek and coworkers prepared porous TiO 2  NFs via a combination of sol-gel and tem-
         plate methods, which led to a 10-fold higher efficiency for WS than crystalline TiO 2
         NPs [185]. Compared to 0D TiO 2  NPs, TiO 2  materials with a 1D nanostructure are
         more promising for WS because of the superior directional charge transport from the
         specific 1D nanostructures [186–188]. D'Ela's group demonstrated the influences of
         the morphology of TiO 2  nanostructures on their WS capabilities. Compared to P25,
         TiO 2  NTAs obtained from a hydrothermal process were found to be more active un-
         der UV irradiation with enhanced charge separation [189]. Park's group successfully
         prepared highly aligned, large surface area porous TiO 2  NFs via electrospinning and
         calcination processes [190]. The as-prepared TiO 2  NFs were 500 nm in diameter and
         a few micrometers in length (Fig. 11.9A and B) and exhibited a much higher photo-
         catalytic WS rate than TiO 2  NPs (Fig. 11.9C). The photocatalytic superiority of TiO 2
         NFs came from the effects of mesoporosity and the NPs' alignment, which enabled
         efficient charge separation through the interparticle charge transfer along the NF
         framework. For TiO 2  nanobelts via electrochemical anodization, a photoconversion ef-
         ficiency of nearly 4.51% at 0.1 V (vs SCE) was obtained, which was higher than TiO 2
         NTAs from the same synthetic method with 2.43% at 0.39 V. Photoelectrochemical
         experiments  have  proved  that  TiO 2   nanobelts show better  separation of  photoin-
         duced charge carriers than other 1D TiO 2  nanostructures. The production of hydrogen
         from TiO 2  nanobelts via an alkali hydrothermal method showed generation rates up
                    − 1
                 − 2
         to 2.41 m  h , which were much higher than those of commercial TiO 2  powder,
                                  − 1
                               − 2
         which had a rate of 1.91 m  h . Zheng's group reported a hierarchically branched
         TiO 2  NR structure (B-NR) that served as a model architecture for efficient photo-
         electrochemical devices because it offered a large contact area with the electrolyte,
         excellent light-trapping characteristics, and a highly conductive pathway for charge
         carrier collection at the same time [60–62]. Under illumination of an Xe lamp (with
                                                   − 2
         a spectrum corresponding to AM 1.5G, 88 mW cm ), the B-NRs produced a pho-
                                   − 2
         tocurrent density of 0.83 mA cm  at 0.8 V vs RHE. The incident photon-to-current
         conversion efficiency reached 67% at 380 nm at 0.6 V vs RHE, nearly two times
         higher than without branches. We can speculate that the branches improved efficiency
         by means of improved charge separation and transport within the branches because of
         their small diameters and a fourfold increase in surface area, which facilitated the hole
   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277