Page 101 - Museums, Media and Cultural Theory In Cultural and Media Studies
P. 101

MEDIA ||  85

                    As a physicist Oppenheimer was aware that modern science was far removed
                  from the ‘naked eye science’ espoused by the early trustees of the AMNH (see
                  Chapter 2, section 2). One of the central functions of the Exploratorium was to
                  render perceptible the imperceptible. The interactive devices developed in the
                  Exploratorium shifted the focus of the museum away from objects and toward
                  the demonstration of scientific principles, processes and phenomena. The
                  exhibits were no longer artefacts to be admired or looked at, but display sup-
                  ports intended to exhibit something other than themselves (Hein 1986: 36). In
                  this sense the science centre contributes to the move away from the object
                  centred museum.
                    This attempt to make perceptible the imperceptible was enabled by the use of
                  Richard Gregory’s work on perception as an organizing principle. Gregory is a
                  British psychologist of perception whose work was used in the Exploratorium,
                  and who later established the Exploratory in Bristol along similar lines to the
                  Exploratorium. He was also involved in the design of the Perception Gallery in
                  the 1977  Human Biology exhibition, produced under the New Exhibition
                  Scheme at the Natural History Museum, London. In all these exhibitions, vis-
                  itors were given centre-stage: in many exhibits the visitor’s own body was both
                  the subject and the means by which the visitor was invited to engage with the
                  exhibit. For example, at the Exploratory, exhibits (which were called ‘plores’)
                  could be divided into those which explored the physical world and those which
                  explored the visitor’s own perceptual experiences: ‘Exploring Ourselves’ and
                  ‘Exploring the World’. ‘Plores’ included colour blindness and hearing tests, an
                  ECG which visitors could use to measure the electricity from their own hearts,
                  and exhibits that tested reaction times as well as optical and other illusions (see
                  www.exploratory.org.uk). Gregory saw illusions as a means to demonstrate
                  how knowledge and sensation interrelate, specifically how a person’s expect-
                  ations and knowledge contradict or override the information provided by their
                  senses. His theories of perception emphasize interaction and creativity – the
                  mind interacts with the world in the process of perception, drawing on stored
                  knowledge and hypotheses as well as immediate sensation, so that perception is
                  essentially a creative act (Gregory 1990).
                    Using Gregory’s theories, exhibits could be constructed that enabled visitors
                  to have fun exploring their own sensory and cognitive responses. The Victorian
                  glass case exhibits had placed the visitor as an observer, and the 1930s mechan-
                  ical and chemical displays had positioned the visitor as an operator or user. But
                  the Exploratorium incorporated the visitor into the exhibition, so that the
                  visitor’s body and mind become the subject and content. The emphasis on the
                  visitor’s own bodily experiences is connected to the view that the process of
                  disseminating scientific knowledge should start with people’s own everyday
                  experience (Hein 1986: 6–7). Like Otto Neurath’s concept of the ‘humanization
   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106