Page 11 - Museums, Media and Cultural Theory In Cultural and Media Studies
P. 11

SERIES  EDITOR’S  FORE WORD














                  The first public museum in Britain was the Ashmolean Museum in Oxford,
                  which opened its doors in 1683. Almost two hundred years would pass, how-
                  ever, before the museum began to consolidate its modern form – an uneven
                  process of development which owed much to the emergence of other kinds of
                  institutions, not least the ‘Great Exhibition’ of 1851, but also the department
                  store. In the United States, various world’s fairs played a similar role as they
                  sought to ‘record the world’s advancement’ in terms of technological progress
                  and public enlightenment. Ever so gradually, from one national context to the
                  next, the features of the museum familiar to us today took root, yet not without
                  sparking controversy at times. Then, as now, the challenges associated with
                  putting certain aspects of social life ‘on display’ have posed acutely difficult –
                  and fiercely contested – questions about the mediation of power. After all, no
                  museum can escape entirely the accusation that its presentation of objects,
                  regardless of how scrupulous its efforts, is political; nor that its carefully
                  crafted decisions about inclusion are necessarily defined, in turn, by that which
                  is excluded.
                    Michelle Henning’s  Museums, Media and Cultural Theory embarks on a
                  fascinating investigation of the cultural significance of museums and exhib-
                  itions. Its purview spans from seventeenth-century innovations, the product of
                  the first cabinets of ‘natural curiosities’ and ‘rarities’ gathered by merchants
                  and explorers in the course of their great voyages of discovery, to the inflections
                  of the ‘virtual museums’ engendered by the new media of today. Maintained
                  throughout Henning’s discussion is a desire to discern the basis for a materialist
                  study of the museum as media-form. In the course of elaborating this fresh
                  approach, she devotes particular attention to the communicative capacity of
   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16