Page 86 - Myths for the Masses An Essay on Mass Communication
P. 86

Mass Communication and the Promise of Democracy

               by the limited availability of intellectual labor or creative talent. In
               any case, what remains is a well-founded need for widespread par-
               ticipation, particularly among the working class, whose expectations
               for inclusionary politics continue to grow with increased literacy
               and education, and despite lacking material prosperity.
                 Since democracy is identified with capitalism (in the United
               States), the democratization of mass communication is predomi-
               nantly an economic issue that focuses on the power of media
               corporations and their influence on the planning and execution of
               mass communication strategies in pursuit of private profit and at
               the expense of public interests.Their creation of consumer demand
               is backed by advertising revenues and demonstrates the workings of
               market relationships that control the mass communication pro-
               cess. The United States is a business, operating under a business
               ideology.
                 A democratic vision of mass communication, on the other hand,
               is based on establishing more humane conditions of existence, which
               include a liberation from the influence of privileged commercial
               interests. Change demands a set of different actors, such as cooper-
               atives, community owners, public-interest control, or employee
               ownership of the means of mass communication, for a more bal-
               anced relationship than the one that is based on a predominantly
               corporate media economy. The question of public participation
               hinges on an ideology of participation, or on a public commitment
               to the task of creating and maintaining an environment for demo-
               cratic communication.
                 Participation in the process of mass communication is based on
               the principle of access. Its understanding begins with the issue of
               competence and includes the acquisition of literacy, communication
               skills, levels of education, and expert knowledge; it continues with
               questions of controlling the production of content and the uses of
               dissemination technologies. It also involves the notion of economic
               affordability, which begins with the cost of (higher) education and
               ends with the price of a quality newspaper or magazine – includ-
               ing marginalized publications – as a source of continuing education.
                 The latter is an important consideration, because lack of educa-
               tion affects communicative competence, and lack of access to an
               informed discourse leads to social or political blindness; it may even

                                             74
   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91