Page 88 - Myths for the Masses An Essay on Mass Communication
P. 88

Mass Communication and the Promise of Democracy

               pace of economic development when he wrote that the  “New
               World democracy” remained an almost complete failure in its social
               aspects, but also in its grand religious, moral, literary, and esthetic
               results, regardless of its success in uplifting the masses, in ma-
               terial developments, and in a highly deceptive superficial popular
               intellectuality.
                 This “superficial popular intellectuality” was the result of mass
               communication, which later on produced “infotainment” and dis-
               traction by trivia; it was also a consequence of cultural deteriora-
               tion, as mass culture critics charge, when the authority of the
               unqualified rules expressions of mass communication. Later criticism
               echoes these concerns, blaming corporate ownership for changing
               expectations of professional standards and returning, albeit implic-
               itly, to the economic determinants of mass communication.
                 It is a devotion to business that characterized nineteenth-century
               American life, and mass communication reproduces its atmosphere
               in structure and content. Structurally, it represents the efforts of
               private ownership, aligned with other business interests, that forge
               an identity of media property as commercial investment rather than
               civic responsibility. Its content is a reminder of merchandizing and
               reproduces an adscititious vocabulary, which includes words such
               as industry, business, commercialism, or capitalism. These are the
               symbols of a new materialism that emerged from the Industrial
               Revolution and became the ideological markers of mass communi-
               cation in its industrial phase. The latter describes the developing
               relationship between democracy and mass communication since the
               start of the twentieth century. It replaces the democratic phase of
               mass communication, which began when democratic goals of equal-
               ity and participation were pursued under the guidance of bourgeois
               thought.
                 The struggle for freedom spread throughout the rest of society
               and provided change, encouraged by a feeling of inclusiveness that
               came with the practice of communication.Thus, the fight for justice
               and equality (during the nineteenth century) was fought with means
               of mass communication that were available and accessible to those
               struggling to be heard. For instance, party newspapers, pamphlets,
               and campaign posters were widely used, giving individuals a voice
               and a sense of belonging. Democracy was experienced in the act of

                                             76
   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93