Page 290 - New Trends in Eco efficient and Recycled Concrete
P. 290

254                               New Trends in Eco-efficient and Recycled Concrete


             Reference Sectoral Documents: The Construction Sector. French-German Institute for
             Environmental Research (DFIU), Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Karlsruhe,
             Germany.
         Schwab, O., Bayer, P., Juraske, R., Verones, F., Hellweg, S., 2014. Beyond the material
             grave: life cycle impact assessment of leaching from secondary materials in road and
             earth constructions. Waste Manage. 34, 1884 1896. Available from: https://doi.org/
             10.1016/j.wasman.2014.04.022.
         Serres, N., Braymand, S., Feugeas, F., 2016. Environmental evaluation of concrete made
             from recycled concrete aggregate implementing life cycle assessment. J. Build. Eng. 5,
             24 33. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2015.11.004.
         Seto, K.E., Panesar, D.K., Churchill, C.J., 2017. Criteria for the evaluation of life cycle
             assessment software packages and life cycle inventory data with application to concrete.
             Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 22, 694 706. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-
             016-1060-6.
         Sev, A., 2009. How can the construction industry contribute to sustainable development? A
             conceptual framework. Sustainable Dev. 17, 161 173. Available from: https://doi.org/
             10.1002/sd.373.
         Silva, R.V., de Brito, J., Dhir, R.K., 2014. Properties and composition of recycled aggregates
             from construction and demolition waste suitable for concrete production. Constr. Build.
             Mater. 65, 201 217. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.04.117.
         Simion, I.M., Fortuna, M.E., Bonoli, A., Gavrilescu, M., 2013. Comparing environmental
             impacts of natural inert and recycled construction and demolition waste processing using
             LCA. J. Environ. Eng. Landsc. Manage. 21, 273 287. Available from: https://doi.org/
             10.3846/16486897.2013.852558.
         Soares, D., de Brito, J., Ferreira, J., Pacheco, J., 2014. Use of coarse recycled aggre-
             gates from precast concrete rejects: mechanical and durability performance.
             Constr. Build. Mater. 71, 263 272. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
             conbuildmat.2014.08.034.
         Solı ´s-Guzma ´n, J., Marrero, M., Montes-Delgado, M.V., Ramı ´rez-de-Arellano, A., 2009. A
             Spanish model for quantification and management of construction waste. Waste Manage.
             29, 2542 2548. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2009.05.009.
         Sonak, S., Pangam, P., Sonak, M., Mayekar, D., 2006. Impact of sand mining on local ecol-
             ogy. Multiple Dimensions of Global Environmental Change. Teri Press, New Delhi,
             India, pp. 101 121.
         Sonnemann, G., Vigon, B., 2011. Global Guidance Principles for Life Cycle Assessment (LCA)
             Databases: A Basis for Greener Processes and Products. UNEP, Paris/Pensacola, FL.
         Souto-Martinez, A., Delesky, E.A., Foster, K.E.O., Srubar, W.V., 2017. A mathematical
             model for predicting the carbon sequestration potential of ordinary portland cement
             (OPC) concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 147, 417 427. Available from: https://doi.org/
             10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.04.133.
         Struble, L., Godfrey, J., 2004. How sustainable is concrete? In: International Workshop on
             Sustainable Development and Concrete Technology. pp. 201 211.
         Tabsh, S.W., Abdelfatah, A.S., 2009. Influence of recycled concrete aggregates on strength
             properties of concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 23, 1163 1167. Available from: https://
             doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2008.06.007.
         Takano, A., Winter, S., Hughes, M., Linkosalmi, L., 2014. Comparison of life cycle assess-
             ment databases: a case study on building assessment. Build. Environ. 79, 20 30.
             Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2014.04.025.
   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295