Page 297 - New Trends in Eco efficient and Recycled Concrete
P. 297

Comparative studies of the life cycle analysis between conventional and recycled aggregate concrete  261


           similar results: impacts were reduced to 88% and 65% of the corresponding conven-
           tional concrete’s impacts in the case of RAC and RAC with fly ash, respectively. The
           main reasons for such improvements in RAC environmental behaviour were avoided
           burdens: avoided waste landfilling and avoided pig-iron production if steel scrap as a
           co-product of recycling was recovered.
              In attributional LCA studies where allocation is used instead of system expan-
           sion with substitution, results are not so beneficial for RAC. The credits from recy-
           cling are accounted for only on the different waste management scenarios
           comparison, not on the level of the product’s life cycle comparison (Vogtl¨ ander
           et al., 2001). With this approach, at best, for low cement increase in RAC, impacts
           of RAC and the corresponding conventional concrete are similar (Weil et al., 2006;
           Marinkovi´ cetal., 2010; Fraj and Idir, 2017; Kleijer et al., 2017). According to
           Jime ´nez et al. (2015), if a mix proportioning method (called ‘equivalent mortar vol-
           ume method’) (Fathifazl et al., 2009) is used in the RAC design, the RAC impacts
           are lower than those of the corresponding conventional concrete, even with an attri-
           butional approach.



           10.3.3 Influence of CO 2 uptake during primary and secondary
                   life of concrete structures

           One important issue often neglected in the environmental assessment of concrete
           structures is the carbonation of concrete over its life cycle. This process has been
           previously investigated a lot as a concrete durability aspect, but it was rarely taken
           into account when assessing CO 2 emissions during the life cycle of concrete
           structures.


           10.3.3.1 Chemistry of carbonation process
           It is a well-known fact that cement production is responsible for a large volume of
           CO 2 emission, approximately 0.8 1.0 tonnes of CO 2 per tonne of cement. About
           half of this amount is emitted from the calcination process of limestone and the
           other half comes from burning of fossil fuels in clinker kilns since high temperature
           is needed for clinker production. The calcination process is a chemical reaction in
           which limestone (which mainly contains calcium carbonate) is converted to calcium
           oxide and carbon dioxide at high temperatures:

                                                                           (10.1)
               CaCO 3 .CaO 1 CO 2
              When exposed to air, concrete will, over time, reabsorb CO 2 from atmosphere in
           a process called carbonation. It is a chemical process reversed to calcination in
           which atmospheric CO 2 diffuses into concrete to react with hydration products (cal-
           cium hydroxide and other calcium-rich hydrated oxides) and form calcium carbon-
           ate again. Carbonation is an inherent process in all cement-based materials.
           Therefore, over the life cycle, part of the CO 2 released from calcination process
   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   302