Page 346 - New Trends in Eco efficient and Recycled Concrete
P. 346

Equivalent functional unit in recycled aggregate concrete         303

                              ω

               ξ 5 1 2 0:5 ω 2                                             (11.5)
                              χ

                   A s f yd
               ω 5                                                         (11.6)
                   bdf cd
              In Eq. (11.5), it is possible to confirm that the height of the cross-section increases
           as the compressive strength factor (χ) decreases. As an example, for ω 5 0.1 (usual
           in slabs), the increase in height for a RAC concrete with a compressive strength of
           50% of NAC, would correspond to an increase in the effective height of 5%. This
           conclusion is in accordance with the consensual idea that for pure bending under nor-
           mal moderate load levels, the class and area of the steel reinforcement is the govern-
           ing factor for the performance of reinforced concrete cross-sections.


           11.4.3 Discussion of a multi-criteria approach (based on
                   structural functionality)

           Even though a simple approach to determine the EFU based on the compressive
           strength alone is attractive in practical terms, it lacks the depth required to fully
           address the different performances of RAC and NAC. As an example, RAC concrete
           structures will not only require a larger section because compressive strength is
           lower, but also it will require a larger section, because the stiffness of RAC is also
           lower than that of NAC. Therefore, it is imperative that a multi-criteria approach is
           conducted, considering all the conditioning factors affecting SLS, ULS and durability
           of RAC structures. To consider this, Dobbelaere et al. (2016) developed a flowchart
           that provided the required steps to define the EFU based on structural functionality of
           RAC (Fig. 11.2). The first step corresponds to establishing the new required cover of
           the reinforcement, as a function of durability parameters (carbonation and chloride
           penetration). Based on this new cover and using simplified criteria, a new cross-
           section height is defined (h RAC ). Using this new cross-section, the structural element
           is sequentially checked for deformation SLS, bending ULS and finally for cracking
           SLS. At each intermediate step, h RAC can be adjusted if it does not comply with the
           limit state in question. At the end of this sequential computations, a design friendly
           parameter (K) is determined, as a function of the most conditioning verifications and
           the EFU can be calculated depending on the fundamental parameters.



           11.5    Proposal of an equivalent functional unit for
                   recycled aggregate concrete

           11.5.1 Practical rules to compare different properties of RAC and
                   NAC
           The determination of an EFU based on a multi-criteria approach requires the defini-
           tion of several ratios (α), which will address each of the performance properties
   341   342   343   344   345   346   347   348   349   350   351