Page 43 - Nightmare Japan Contemporary Japanese Horror Cinema
P. 43

30                                            Nightmare Japan

                              scenes  that  merge  what  Jane  Caputi  identifies  as  ‘pornographic  and
                              gorenographic  images’  (1992:  213),  the  female  victim’s  body  is
                              continually reduced to an object, a ‘thing’ to be abused and butchered. As
                              a result, Devil’s Experiment depicts ‘an extreme expression of patriarchal
                              “force”’  (206).  A  demonstration  ‘of  sexual  politics’  and  ‘male
                              domination’, the film is a visual ‘form of terror that functions to maintain
                              the power of the patriarchal order’ (206).
                                     This  is  not  to  suggest  that  Satoru’s  film  is  explicitly
                              pornographic  (or  porno-graphically  explicit),  though  its  visual  rhetoric
                              repeatedly  adopts  the  fragmentation  of  human  body  as  its  central
                              metaphor.  Nor  am  I  claiming  that  Devil’s  Experiment  is  irrevocably
                              misogynistic. Given Satoru’s aesthetics of disruption, in which everything
                              from  the  text’s  deconstruction  of  its  initial  claims  of  documentary
                              authenticity  to  the  director’s  manipulation  of  the  audience’s  gaze  is
                              designed  to  undermine  conventional  viewing  practices,  we  can  also
                              understand  this  text  as  providing  a  politically  charged  meditation  on
                              cultural  dynamics  akin  to  the  practices  of  world  cinema’s  more
                              accomplished  experimental,  and  politically-progressive,  filmmakers.
                              Through its vacillating POV, Devil’s Experiment collapses subjective and
                              objective  vision  in  a  manner  that  resembles  the  ‘dissolution  of  the
                              boundary  between  inside  and  outside…private  and  public’  that  Elaine
                              Scarry  locates  in  the  practice  of  torture.  As  such,  the  film  can  be
                              understood  as  a  complex  study  of  power,  specifically  the  ‘regime’  of
                              violent male authority wielded against the feminine form.
                                     Thus,  the  ‘experiment’  that  Satoru’s  film  offers  viewers  is  a
                              distinctly  cinematic  one,  approaching,  at  times,  a  level  of  socio-cultural
                              critique  most  frequently  attributed  to  experimental  or  avant-garde
                              filmmaking.  In  the  film’s  climactic  moment,  for  example,  the  three
                              torturers  push  a  needle  into  the  woman’s  temple,  angling  it  until  it
                              emerges through her eye. Immediately reminiscent of the famous eyeball
                              slicing  scene  from  the  Luis  Buñuel  –  Salvador  Dali  collaboration,  Un
                              Chien  Andalou  (France,  1929),  the  retinal  puncturing  in  Devil’s
                              Experiment  is  a  seemingly  inevitable  yet  powerful  moment  of  ocular
                              horror,  its  immediacy  providing  an  ultimate  corporeal  violation  of  the
                              female  victim,  as  well  as  a  final,  visceral  intrusion  upon  the  spectator’s
   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48