Page 59 - Nightmare Japan Contemporary Japanese Horror Cinema
P. 59

46                                            Nightmare Japan

                              disarticulation  advance  a  radical  politics  of  identity  through  visual
                              displays of corporeal extremity and disintegration?
                                     As  a  means  of  addressing  these  questions,  consider  a  string  of
                              events  that  take  place  late  in  the  film.  Unable  to  die  no  matter  how
                              violently he attacks himself, Hideshi phones his colleague, Nakamura. In
                              the course of their conversation, Hideshi convinces Nakamura to pay him
                              a late night visit,  interrupting,  in the process, the  handsome Nakamura’s
                              exchange  of  post-coital  tendernesses  with  the  equally  comely  Kyoko.
                              Nakamura, the antithesis of the socially stagnant and withdrawn Hideshi,
                              arrives  at  his  co-worker’s  tiny  apartment  only  to  discover  a  pale,  gore-
                              soaked  Hideshi  who,  pretending  to  be  a  zombie,  states:  ‘I  am  not  the
                              Hideshi of before. No longer the old Hideshi who is always apologizing.
                              No, I am sorry. Not really, but…meet the new Hideshi who will not die.’
                              It  is  at  this  point  that  Hideshi  disembowels  himself  and,  laughing
                              hysterically, pelts  a  screaming,  frightened  Nakamura  with an  assortment
                              of tangled, blood-drenched internal organs.
                                     This  sequence  is  vital  to  Kuzumi’s  film,  for  it  transforms  the
                              reactive,  put-upon  Hideshi  into  an  active  agent,  a  Deleuzian  ‘Body
                              without  Organs’  that  exceeds  binary  constructs  like  ‘life’  and  ‘death’;
                              ‘internal’  and  ‘external’;  ‘clean’  and  ‘dirty’,  or  ‘sterile’  and
                              ‘contaminating’.  What  makes  Hideshi  unique  in  a  culture  of  conformity
                              also  makes  him  monstrous,  but  ecstatically  so.  As  his  body  resists  the
                              physical  logics  that  should  logically  culminate  in  his  death,  Hideshi
                              transforms  into  an  object  of  ‘pure  immanence’;  he  becomes  an  infinite
                              becoming, ‘a singular life’ that ‘can be mistaken  for no other’ (Deleuze,
                              2001:  29).  In  contrast,  Nakamura  and  Kyoko  scramble  about  Hideshi’s
                              tiny  abode  on  their  hands  and  knees,  sopping  up  gallons  of  blood  and
                              complaining  about  the  ‘dirt’  and  ‘contaminating’  filth.  Through  these
                              actions,  which  Hideshi’s  laughing  head  watches  with  a  combination  of
                              amazement  and  ridicule,  Nakamura  and  Kyoko  firmly  position
                              themselves  within an  ideological  framework  preoccupied  with discipline
                              and order. Additionally, their impulse to clean Hideshi’s apartment reifies
                              the notion that the excretions (including the blood) of others violates long
                              established  conceptualisations  of  ‘internal’  and  ‘external’,  ultimately
                              realising  what  Emiko  Ohnoki-Tierney  describes  as  ‘people  dirt’,  an
   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64