Page 243 - Numerical Analysis and Modelling in Geomechanics
P. 243

224 SEISMIC MICROZONING USING NUMERICAL MODELLING
            scale,  to  all  the  villages  and  gave  to  each  local  situation  a  value  of  the
            amplification factor on the basis of the table defined at the end of the first phase.
              It is worth noting that the feeling of mutual support in an emergency was the
            main reason for the positive results of the process.
              Considerable  work  was  done  on  site  effect  analysis:  some  researchers  used
            experimental approaches, others developed numerical codes for the evaluation of
            the amplification. In the field of experimental approaches both strong events, and
            microtremors and small events were used and numerical methods are available
            for  1D,  2D  and  3D  analysis.  In  this  particular  case,  experimental  approaches
            were discarded for reasons of both time and cost, as explained above. The choice
            of  1D  and  2D  techniques  derives  from  the  quantity  and  quality  of  input  data
            available and the need for fast computation in order to fulfil the time requirement
            previously mentioned.
              The Umbria Region is now applying a similar procedure in the areas that have
            not been affected by the earthquake, as a support for urban planning in the frame
            of prevention policies.

                                     The seismic input

            The area affected by the earthquake sequence of September 1997 is located in a
            region  with  several  dissected  seismic  structures,  still  not  very  well  known  and
            identified as defined seismic sources. Therefore, it being impossible to separate
            the  seismic  hazard  contribution  coming  from  all  the  possible  sources  to  each
            village, the cumulative contribution, on a probabilistic basis, was derived from
            all  relevant  neighbouring  seismogenetic  areas.  The  probabilistic  approach  also
            fits with the aim of the project, that is, the evaluation of a set of parameters to be
            entered in code for building restoration and new building design.
              Calculations  were  made  treating  seismic  source  zones  as  areas  of  uniformly
            distributed  seismicity  following  a  Poisson  process.  According  to  Cornell’s
            (1968) methodology the expected ground motion values, for a 10% probability
            of exceedence within a reference time period of 50 years, were computed.
              The hazard analysis results are summarized through uniform hazard response
            spectra and an equivalent set of time-histories suitable for microzoning study.


                                      Hazard analysis
            The seismic hazard calculation is an application of the total-probability theorem
            (Harr, 1987) and it is usually presented in the following form:

                                                                         (8.1)


            where P is the probability that a ground-motion amplitude A is greater than a in
            time t; f  denotes the probability density function of the magnitude distribution;
                  M
   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248