Page 116 - Offshore Electrical Engineering Manual
P. 116

Pole Configuration  103




                  POLE CONFIGURATION

                  At a given frequency, motor synchronous speed is determined by the number of poles
                  incorporated in the motor stator, and this governs the maximum operating speed of
                  the machine. The fastest possible speed of both induction and synchronous motors is
                  with a two-pole configuration, which gives synchronous speeds of 3000 rpm at 50 Hz
                  and 3600 rpm at 60 Hz, respectively.
                    As size and weight penalties are usually incurred by increasing the number of
                  poles, only two- and four-pole machines are normally used offshore. An occasional
                  exception is large reciprocating compressor drivers, where eight-pole (or more) syn-
                  chronous machines may be used. These machines, apart from giving the required
                  lower speed, also reduce the current fluctuations caused by the cyclic torque varia-
                  tions associated with reciprocating machinery.
                     The advantages and disadvantages of two-pole against four-pole machines are
                  listed in the following.

                    1.   Advantages of two-pole machines

                     a. Energy conversion within the higher-speed two-pole machine is usually more
                       efficient, giving some reduction in size and weight for a given output. However,
                       because of the higher rotor speeds, especially at 60 Hz, mechanical forces on the
                       rotor cage, known as hoop stresses, become significant and limit the maximum
                       dimensions of rotor that may be manufactured using conventional materials.
                       Metallurgically more exotic materials may be used to extend this limit with, of
                       course, the accompanying large increases in the cost of the machine.
                     b. Manufacturers differ in the application of a practical maximum rating limit

                       for a two-pole motor, but as a general rule, this is between 3 and 5 MW.
                       Therefore motors above 5 MW should not be considered as a feasible alter-
                       native unless the cost of using exotic metals in the rotor is outweighed by the
                       savings accrued by, for example, the elimination of a gearbox.

                     c. Below this limit, and within manufacturers’ normal product ranges, the use of a
                       two-pole machine should, in comparison with an equivalent four-pole machine,
                       provide dimension and weight savings roughly proportional to power rating;
                       however, for small machines of only a few kilowatts, there is little benefit.
                    2.   Disadvantages of two-pole machines

                     a. The starting torque of two-pole machines is less, requiring the driven equip-
                       ment to have a lower moment of inertia. It may also prove more difficult to
                       accelerate the machine up to operating speed, where driven machinery can-
                       not be run up to speed unloaded. The speed/torque characteristics of pumps
                       in particular should be carefully studied to avoid any problems. Starting
                       currents are also likely to be higher, and with large machines, this may lead
                       to unacceptable voltage dips.
                     b. Irregularities in the core stampings, which are inevitable unless very high

                       levels of quality control are applied, generate more magnetic noise in two-
                       pole machines. A characteristic low-frequency (twice slip frequency) growl
                       can be heard from these motors.
   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121