Page 106 - Open-Hole Log Analysis and Formation Evaluation

- studies, The The LOG For FIGURE LDT FDC SNP Dual CNL GR MLL. MSFL DLL IES DIT ISF Log ‘ I.

study
NGS
(1973).
-
need
Neutron
Porosity
Proximity
further
5.19
. BEFORE ‘SUMMARY METHODS
results
such
Schlumberger
_ LL GR 4 OF
for
Table
QUALITY
as
LU
log
5.2
. NRAT MLL PROX CMSF LLD LLS 16” N ILD ILD ILM SFL ILD Curve AND OF
Control (Bateman
SS1
SS2
SNP
details
LITH
show,
Need for Log
FFDC
NRAT
FECN
the
NFDC
NECN
W3NG
W2NG
WING
W5NG
W4NG
:
|.
on
Calibration
— AFTER GATHERING
_. CPS CPS ‘ + 0.04 RATIO me + 0.04 RATIO . #15 CPS +1 +15 MMHO/M — +4 #15- MMHO/M MMHO/M +2 + 20° +. 20 MMHOIM - #20 + 0.7 2M + 07 QM +0.08 + 1.05 QM +2 +20 MHO/M +2 +20 MHO/M- MHO/M +2 +20 +2 +20 MHO/M +20 MHO/M #2 Zero Plus Units Tolerance Tolerance’. SUMMARIES TOLERANCES FORMATION EVALUATION DATA 93
one
poor
1985).
Well Services.
quality
log
CONTROL
by
log
Quality
summarizes
control
the
.Tolerances
Neinast
quality
has
Control
+
+
+
calibrations
+
+
and
+ 6
+4
4
+22
#13
+14
results
+6
6
been
20
+20
control
0.5
«+03
0.5.
of
°°.
Knox
please
can
of

their
(Schlumberger
BETWEEN
%
°.°.%
%
%
%
refer
CPS
CPS
CPS
result
CPS
CPS
Sun
CPS
CPS
CPS
to
in
documented
Oil
Logs).
a
studies.
in
Log

As

large
per-
these
various
Company
Courtesy
Quality

If
to
of
be
the
the
the
go
time.
No
there
Verden
the
before
quality
Source:
during
quality
After
Sonic
smooth
bottom
tracted.
there
centage
logs
a
Density
Density
Density
objective
company
Neutron
It is the
minimum
recording
formation
is
back
Even
the
responses,
Induction
this degree
is
logging
logging
of
Upper Valley
}
Field,
Calibrations
matter
in
in
each
Give
done after the
the
depth-related
to
impossible
are ways
errors
errors
control
any
logging
Practical Log
are
Reprinted
the
the
crew
logs
the
errors
logs
available.
to
Field,
logging
obtained
log
logs
.
in
the best
0.02
0.01
the
0.01
personnel
get
log.is
rigs
are
engineer
-10
hole
Utah
operation.
Oklahoma
equipment
develop
hole should be
of the well. Do
interruption.
Learn
expect a representative
being
error
question
Quality
g/cc
g/cc
g/cc
first print is
only
with
after
not
procedures
engineer
in
company’s
operation
of the
“remarks”
mmho
down.
before
a
how competent
what
function of the well
another
engineers
by permission
is
are
failure,
Logging
about
best
complete,
and
and
thoroughly as possible. Ask for an
whom
Checks
measurements
or
error.
they
46%
36%
may
rigging
33%
15%
25%
23%
46%
distract
of the
log quality also depends
in which bad logs can
column
when
relationships
chance
engineer.
after
will
completely
you
the
Generally
on
hole
resistivity
to
available
validity,
quality.
the
mean
make
discuss
down,
the
to be available-and
the
of the
operations
in
enough to verify the
200
it
tool
work.
and
ft
but
explanation
job.
log
SPWLA from
of mutual
survey
Frequently,
Perhaps
include
log.
is
logging
conscientious
objective
in the
perform
of
request
with
should
problems,
The
how
an
a
once
100%
the
56%
the
81%
61%
render them useless as formation
43%
26%
one
78%
Bateman
the
to
Further
of any
be
Neinast
within
the
and
or
heading.
repeat
mistakes when
most
pipe
trust with
logging
engineer
use
most
operator’s representative to
and
rerun
made but before any more prints
in
is
errors
: Texas . Big Wells Field, Schlumberger Dresser Atlas Welex of Log Quality Study by Sun Oil TABLE 5.2 Results 5. WIRELINE LOGGING OPERATIONS
type.
competence and
1000
observer
(1985).
of
the
This
more
details
enter
verifications
are
ft
set,
of any abnormal
Knox
they are
operation
critical
them.
the
during
ensure
of
of
the
engineer
_—
—
_
made.
33%
T'
58%
70%
67%
1973.
he
evaluation tools.
curve
it wil!
in
repeat
dis-
log
made.
may be,
in-
relatively
Everyone is reluctant
may be
log
defy detection at the wellsite. To
logging
log
integrity
important
as
Service-company personnel
unit during

that
discussed with
this
with
time
of the